IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] draft-saintandre-json-namespaces-00 comments

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 08 November 2011 17:05 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB0911E80A2 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 09:05:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.159
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.159 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.560, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j3RfEHXOWQCf for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 09:05:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C14911E809B for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 09:05:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Nov 2011 17:05:13 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.140]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp071) with SMTP; 08 Nov 2011 18:05:13 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18scIIAfIwsdOFWgo48Td2xzkkF1Ttr0Sip7z0xrN GP+Coe6dfozgdu
Message-ID: <4EB96142.5070305@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 18:05:06 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl>
References: <4EB923CF.7080600@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <4EB923CF.7080600@wp.pl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] draft-saintandre-json-namespaces-00 comments
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 17:05:16 -0000

On 2011-11-08 13:42, Dominik Tomaszuk wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Clark Notation can sometimes be too heavy, especially when namespaces
> are placed in many keys. I propose to give possibility to declare
> namespace. For instance:
 > ...

This copies a design pattern that many people hate in XML namespaces 
(*not* including myself...).

Also, if compactness is an issue, the obvious answer is to gzip the payload.

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email