Re: [apps-discuss] draft-saintandre-json-namespaces-00 comments

"Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@commscope.com> Wed, 09 November 2011 03:03 UTC

Return-Path: <Martin.Thomson@commscope.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AEA81F0C61 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 19:03:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.256
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.256 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.657, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5z1n2En2XIgv for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 19:03:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cdcsmgw01.commscope.com (fw.commscope.com [198.135.207.129]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F05E1F0C5C for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 19:03:46 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 0a0404e8-b7c2eae000002297-fd-4eb9ed8d67aa
Received: from ACDCE7HC2.commscope.com ( [10.86.20.103]) by cdcsmgw01.commscope.com (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with SMTP id 49.CB.08855.D8DE9BE4; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 21:03:41 -0600 (CST)
Received: from CDCE10HC2.commscope.com (10.86.28.22) by ACDCE7HC2.commscope.com (10.86.20.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 21:03:41 -0600
Received: from SISPE7HC2.commscope.com (10.97.4.13) by CDCE10HC2.commscope.com (10.86.28.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.339.1; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 21:03:39 -0600
Received: from SISPE7MB1.commscope.com ([fe80::9d82:a492:85e3:a293]) by SISPE7HC2.commscope.com ([fe80::58c3:2447:f977:57c3%10]) with mapi; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 11:03:35 +0800
From: "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@commscope.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, apps-discuss Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 11:03:32 +0800
Thread-Topic: [apps-discuss] draft-saintandre-json-namespaces-00 comments
Thread-Index: AcyehhwdGzuty0ioTAyOeYiEyqowHQABbwTA
Message-ID: <27AFD040F6F8AA4193E0614E2E3AF9C910D7C1F479@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com>
References: <4EB923CF.7080600@wp.pl> <566A345F-15CD-473B-8472-11EDF73A3862@vpnc.org> <9D5B00CA-9370-45D6-835B-3C7A1ADFEBBC@mnot.net> <4EB97122.7010206@gmx.de> <D75C8075-C8DF-4AA2-9DFC-CED719A0564E@mnot.net> <4EB98090.5020203@gmx.de> <6A0CCE36-5FBE-48E9-A307-1C59C155D8BB@mnot.net> <4EB981B6.1090003@gmx.de> <CALcoZipiOC4ro_Mhhnu7VRAJdSU_N1AhwPa+0XCppQozWiOf0Q@mail.gmail.com> <7797835D-26FA-45E4-B66B-A336666F7AC7@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <7797835D-26FA-45E4-B66B-A336666F7AC7@vpnc.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] draft-saintandre-json-namespaces-00 comments
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 03:03:47 -0000

On 2011-11-09 at 13:19:17, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> > http://json-ld.org
> 
> I would prefer that the output of this work was much, much simpler 
> than this.

+1.

@context is essentially the same as XML namespace prefixes, with the same basic problem: two labels can have different semantics, determined by another "special" label.