Re: [apps-discuss] draft-saintandre-json-namespaces-00 comments

[Peter Saint-Andre <[e-mail]>]

On 11/8/11 12:18 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2011-11-08 20:10, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> I don't think URIs should be used for this.
>> ...
>
> Well, one use case that the proposal is addressing is the transport of
> data from frameworks that *already* use URIs; such a WebDAV properties
> or JCR identifiers. In these cases you really have only the choice of
> using the identifiers you have, or establishing a completely new
> identifier system.
>
> And yes, it would be helpful if the draft was just saying that and not
> make the impression that it was solving the generic problem for JSON.

There's always an opportunity for publishing -01. ;-)

I agree that a range of approaches might be appropriate among JSON-using 
communities -- pretty much the same range of approaches mentioned in the 
x- draft:

        implementation-specific and
        private-use parameters could at least incorporate the
        organization's name (e.g., "ExampleInc-foo" or, consistent with
        [RFC4288], "VND.ExampleInc.foo") or primary domain name (e.g.,
        "com.example.foo" or a Uniform Resource Identifier [RFC3986] such
        as "http://example.com/foo").

I'll work with my co-authors to submit -01 next week or soon thereafter.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/