Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication of this document"

Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> Wed, 11 May 2011 15:35 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.brim@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B43E081F for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2011 08:35:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8LEn5QnUwS8W for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2011 08:35:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E50E0816 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2011 08:35:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so798484iwn.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2011 08:35:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hFbd//A3q1Hy6dFvBl1Z+uBFWcJxfYcPrlpkheSQeUY=; b=ADdZSfR0ngdbIS7C9q4/VjQIHrqvI0fy80ukvHe6wHMNcvG/K3pEeSdYE/JfagBmKg fLx8fYB9rSLXjhK4oaYWzhIZsYzmjPNoeu3jeMOx/xHiyenBfL8+f8k6X8rjm8kktXd/ LYR+o0AexCqL4OWZFmaOpa5v3u8gP0Xi8IhpQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=TtLGIfUpT4/yiUsaHjdE5H6VZIVJY+30QcJpDkdmQ7OEDO/yf2rvSvXhpuWN++Vwfm ndxSo2n7McsLf8OkFoaCbmFmC0dkgEX97jIwJEfNvxDO0APW0KwGEVQL9y1i7v9gb6uz +sBwPRLU/5L7TBGZQOfWUJleYiMacWHqd9tDk=
Received: by 10.231.51.17 with SMTP id b17mr6918807ibg.0.1305128142095; Wed, 11 May 2011 08:35:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.30.205 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 08:35:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4DCAAAB9.3080702@dcrocker.net>
References: <4DC88255.3070403@qualcomm.com> <4DC94F74.30905@dcrocker.net> <4DC9A9B9.3010702@stpeter.im> <4DCAAAB9.3080702@dcrocker.net>
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 11:35:21 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=f15OpaufbCZt3qJww1C2FJDLUiQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>, apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication of this document"
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 15:35:43 -0000

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:26, Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:
> It has the considerable benefit of guiding the respondent to provide
> pragmatic detail.
>
> The IETF would do well to include some form of similar guidance in its Last
> Call announcement.

> I don't see a problem with having a potential large number of people supply
> detailed responses.  (For one thing, I doubt that the typical case is/will
> be a large number...)

Glad to hear it.  I couldn't tell where you were headed.

Scott