Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication of this document"
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Wed, 11 May 2011 01:27 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163ADE068D for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vtkIsPK94X67 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:27:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD90E0689 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from squire.local (dsl-175-253.dynamic-dsl.frii.net [216.17.175.253]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0CB2F400ED; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:27:00 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4DC9E5DB.6030005@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 19:26:51 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
References: <4DC88255.3070403@qualcomm.com> <4DC94F74.30905@dcrocker.net> <4DC9A9B9.3010702@stpeter.im> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F134331A41A@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
In-Reply-To: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F134331A41A@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms060601000501000207080500"
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication of this document"
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 01:27:04 -0000
On 5/10/11 4:35 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Peter Saint-Andre >> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 2:10 PM >> To: dcrocker@bbiw.net >> Cc: Pete Resnick; apps-discuss@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication of this document" >> >> # Please consider the following questions during this Last Call and >> # send your feedback to the standards@xmpp.org discussion list: >> # >> # 1. Is this specification needed to fill gaps in the XMPP >> # protocol stack or to clarify an existing protocol? >> # 2. Does the specification solve the problem stated in the >> # introduction and requirements? >> # 3. Do you plan to implement this specification in your code? >> # If not, why not? >> # 4. Do you have any security concerns related to this specification? >> # 5. Is the specification accurate and clearly written? >> >> Whether that's the right set of questions is another issue... > > This, and especially that last one, makes it sound like a PROTO write-up. Are you sure you want that from a potentially huge list of people? Well, that's what we ask at xmpp.org. I'm not suggesting that we do so at ietf.org. :) Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
- [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication of … Pete Resnick
- Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication… SM
- Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication… dave
- Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication… John Leslie
- Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication… Scott Brim
- Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication… Pete Resnick
- Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication… Ted Hardie
- Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication… Pete Resnick
- Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication… Scott Brim
- Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication… John C Klensin
- Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication… t.petch
- Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication… Joseph Yee
- Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication… Nico Williams