IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: httpbis vs yam meeting slots in Stockholm

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 09 July 2009 17:01 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8BAF28C179 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:01:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.623
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.623 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.894, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_MLH_Stock1=0.87]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DWnlXrCZBApB for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:01:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B8F2E28C1E9 for <discuss@apps.ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 09 Jul 2009 17:01:50 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.117]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp013) with SMTP; 09 Jul 2009 19:01:50 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/FsjYK9RLFTirXktElJHHFx2ldXJG4vrBEnLl3aJ JPWqWzeDnv40UZ
Message-ID: <4A562279.5060802@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:01:45 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060516 Thunderbird/1.5.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Subject: Re: httpbis vs yam meeting slots in Stockholm
References: <4A52F11F.6000400@gmx.de> <59412B3595BB07DCFCFDC95E@caldav.corp.apple.com> <4A561F0A.1030100@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A561F0A.1030100@isode.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-FuHaFi: 0.57
Cc: Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:01:25 -0000

Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> Cyrus Daboo wrote:
> 
>> Hi Julian,
>>
>> --On July 7, 2009 8:54:23 AM +0200 Julian Reschke 
>> <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>>> I just noticed that HTTPBIS and YAM run in parallel; that's IMHO
>>> non-optimal because both would benefit from people with MIME 
>>> experience...
>>>
>>> Dunno whether this has been already considered, and whether it's 
>>> possible
>>> to do something about it...
>>
>> +1
>>
>> We should try and get this conflict fixed.
> 
> Can we swap httpbis with either:
> Monday, 13:00-15:00 (idnabis)
> or
> Tuesday, 13:00-15:00 (alto)

Both sound good to me; the things I'd like HTTPbis not to collide with 
are YAM and VCARDDAV (but of course that's just a personal preference).

BR, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email