IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: httpbis vs yam meeting slots in Stockholm

Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name> Tue, 07 July 2009 14:14 UTC

Return-Path: <cyrus@daboo.name>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90D6828C4B2 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 07:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.729
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.729 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_MLH_Stock1=0.87]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a3ab4I0E1Oea for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 07:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from daboo.name (daboo.name [151.201.22.177]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E390728C4AE for <discuss@apps.ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 07:14:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0479168065F; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 10:14:48 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daboo.name
Received: from daboo.name ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (chewy.mulberrymail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G7-J8DE8kCc5; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 10:14:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from caldav.corp.apple.com (unknown [17.101.32.44]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA281680658; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 10:14:47 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:14:42 -0400
From: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: httpbis vs yam meeting slots in Stockholm
Message-ID: <59412B3595BB07DCFCFDC95E@caldav.corp.apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A52F11F.6000400@gmx.de>
References: <4A52F11F.6000400@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.1.0a1 (Mac OS X)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline; size="412"
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:14:48 -0000

Hi Julian,

--On July 7, 2009 8:54:23 AM +0200 Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> 
wrote:

> I just noticed that HTTPBIS and YAM run in parallel; that's IMHO
> non-optimal because both would benefit from people with MIME experience...
>
> Dunno whether this has been already considered, and whether it's possible
> to do something about it...

+1

We should try and get this conflict fixed.

-- 
Cyrus Daboo

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email