Re: httpbis vs yam meeting slots in Stockholm

Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> Fri, 10 July 2009 14:37 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@att.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C173A6AAF for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:37:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.841
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.841 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.112, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_MLH_Stock1=0.87, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hoq1KtWsrFuo for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail121.messagelabs.com (mail121.messagelabs.com [216.82.242.3]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C3A3A6B96 for <discuss@apps.ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: tony@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-121.messagelabs.com!1247236667!22691557!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.0.0; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [144.160.128.141]
Received: (qmail 6791 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 14:37:48 -0000
Received: from sbcsmtp9.sbc.com (HELO flph161.enaf.ffdc.sbc.com) (144.160.128.141) by server-12.tower-121.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 14:37:48 -0000
Received: from enaf.ffdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by flph161.enaf.ffdc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n6AEblru025761 for <discuss@apps.ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:37:47 -0700
Received: from klph001.kcdc.att.com (klph001.kcdc.att.com [135.188.3.11]) by flph161.enaf.ffdc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n6AEbgVg025691 for <discuss@apps.ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:37:43 -0700
Received: from kcdc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by klph001.kcdc.att.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id n6AEbgRf027904 for <discuss@apps.ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:37:42 -0500
Received: from maillennium.att.com (mailgw1.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by klph001.kcdc.att.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id n6AEbbw0027745 for <discuss@apps.ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:37:37 -0500
Received: from [135.70.141.115] (vpn-135-70-141-115.vpn.mwst.att.com[135.70.141.115]) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20090710143736gw1003ibqie> (Authid: tony); Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:37:37 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [135.70.141.115]
Message-ID: <4A575230.4030409@att.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:37:36 -0400
From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Subject: Re: httpbis vs yam meeting slots in Stockholm
References: <4A52F11F.6000400@gmx.de> <59412B3595BB07DCFCFDC95E@caldav.corp.apple.com> <4A561F0A.1030100@isode.com> <A9E3809AE5D93F28D69827D6@PST.JCK.COM> <96684634-7032-4399-9721-75BA83893025@mnot.net> <4A570976.2090108@isode.com> <4A570A3A.9090704@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A570A3A.9090704@isode.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:37:22 -0000

Would Wed afternoon @1510 work? There appears to be an open slot there.
The only potential conflict I see is with SIMPLE, but I'm less concerned
about that compared with HTTPbis.

    Tony

Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>
>> Mark Nottingham wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> It'd be best if we could move HTTPbis to another slot on Thursday; 
>>> e.g., morning I
>>
>> This wouldn't work, as there are no room available.
>> And there are no Apps area slots, so we can't swap anything. We could
>> try to swap slots with WG in other areas, but this might create other
>> conflicts elsewhere.
>> Also note that the morning I is 2.5 hours, not 2 hours allocated for
>> HTTPBIS.
>>
>>> and afternoon II don't have any obvious conflicts (at  least to me),
>>> and afternoon II looks to have available space (although  I suspect
>>> that's because congresshall A and B are being prepared for  the
>>> plenary, although I note congresshall C is in use).
>>
>> It is also only 1 hour long.
>
> Considering that my original proposal is not working and I showed that
> Mark's alternatives wouldn't work either, I am suggesting we leave
> things as is.
> Unless people have a third proposal that would work for the majority
> of interested participants.
>
> We can try to coordinate agendas between the two meetings.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Apps-Discuss mailing list
> Apps-Discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss