Re: httpbis vs yam meeting slots in Stockholm

[Eric Burger <[e-mail]>]

And, as an ALTO author, I would prefer not to have a YAM/ALTO  
conflict, if possible.

On Jul 10, 2009, at 10:37 AM, Tony Hansen wrote:

> Would Wed afternoon @1510 work? There appears to be an open slot  
> there.
> The only potential conflict I see is with SIMPLE, but I'm less  
> concerned
> about that compared with HTTPbis.
>
>    Tony
>
> Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>> Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>>
>>> Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>> It'd be best if we could move HTTPbis to another slot on Thursday;
>>>> e.g., morning I
>>>
>>> This wouldn't work, as there are no room available.
>>> And there are no Apps area slots, so we can't swap anything. We  
>>> could
>>> try to swap slots with WG in other areas, but this might create  
>>> other
>>> conflicts elsewhere.
>>> Also note that the morning I is 2.5 hours, not 2 hours allocated for
>>> HTTPBIS.
>>>
>>>> and afternoon II don't have any obvious conflicts (at  least to  
>>>> me),
>>>> and afternoon II looks to have available space (although  I suspect
>>>> that's because congresshall A and B are being prepared for  the
>>>> plenary, although I note congresshall C is in use).
>>>
>>> It is also only 1 hour long.
>>
>> Considering that my original proposal is not working and I showed  
>> that
>> Mark's alternatives wouldn't work either, I am suggesting we leave
>> things as is.
>> Unless people have a third proposal that would work for the majority
>> of interested participants.
>>
>> We can try to coordinate agendas between the two meetings.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Apps-Discuss mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> Apps-Discuss mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss