[apps-discuss] RFC 5147 implementations (was: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-yevstifeyev-ftp-uri-scheme-04.txt)

Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com> Sat, 16 July 2011 09:12 UTC

Return-Path: <evnikita2@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 281E321F85E1 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 02:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.504
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.504 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.095, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qtc3omcPR7Tz for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 02:12:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A42B621F854E for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 02:12:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxe4 with SMTP id 4so4668948fxe.27 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 02:12:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ii86NrQJsm0XFMn3bgUmDNYqDbNMNBP/3MDUp6tvAbs=; b=R94u9olWbkVYApzqarkZsTXLMqcyZN7YpifOcHGlWi2+/5AvD8WwZP/DYT3UZWqgXb Ypz90h4zaKRkEuIESBRyqIZg9/SeGMRVhMV5d0oa4IVniuhUX7p7Pbc+zXof5KNqkHBN qONBmTjS8JwwgtTJL31Ki1Vor21cUdKIN7Xpw=
Received: by with SMTP id e8mr6382472fax.39.1310807554704; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 02:12:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] ([]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm1339551fas.40.2011. (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 16 Jul 2011 02:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E21562D.4020308@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 12:13:17 +0300
From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
References: <4E15C895.6020701@gmail.com> <4E1B3270.40601@gmail.com> <CAHhFybpG-eoLb0uQ-JR9k7r1-NUohihXWS+w4Vsznpx=zYbGYA@mail.gmail.com> <4E1E62AB.2070608@gmail.com> <CAHhFyboH+EfdBzNTZtr9T9VNmUh6=psx2uBsS7Pc-HYmdWL65g@mail.gmail.com> <4E1FB79D.1020603@gmail.com> <4E1FBBC2.4070303@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <CAHhFybrOZYFXD5MasMx5ThxdnT36nLmXy+3ho-VrjaygQMA9zQ@mail.gmail.com> <4E214464.7060208@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <CAHhFybqygsy9W_T=ymPvTSnY3oMqpEZbavXTTjfTTS32vUtEZQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHhFybqygsy9W_T=ymPvTSnY3oMqpEZbavXTTjfTTS32vUtEZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [apps-discuss] RFC 5147 implementations (was: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-yevstifeyev-ftp-uri-scheme-04.txt)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 09:12:40 -0000

Frank, all,

I've tested with Opera 11.5 - it doesn't seem to work.  Nor does Safari 
3.2.1 for Windows.

Regarding FF - I submitted Bug 662583 
(https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660583) a while ago 
reporting this issue.  I don't know whether and when it is going to be 


16.07.2011 11:50, Frank Ellermann wrote:
> [about RFC 5147]
>> Does that mean that it's implemented in Firefox and Opera?
> FF5 test with<http://www.postel.org/ien/txt/ien111.txt#line=1483>
> No, sorry.  No opera on my box, that will be my last resort if I'm
> ever annoyed with IE + Chrome + FF at the same time.  But I read
> AvK's blog, just in case.
>> For Chrome, you could submit a bug or patch to webkit, I guess.
> Chromium issue 77024, waiting for "confirmation" since March.  For
> IE9 a very complete issue report was closed as "not reproducible",
> and I concluded that the IE9+ developers are not too interested
> in contributions from IE9+ users.
> -Frank
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss