IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-saintandre-xdash-03.txt

Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net> Fri, 19 August 2011 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A0C21F8B4F for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:11:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.266
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.266 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.333, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id siCcZnz7l8uq for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F23921F8B53 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.156] (adsl-68-122-69-114.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [68.122.69.114]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7JLBsvU028940 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:11:59 -0700
Message-ID: <4E4ED197.9080008@dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:11:51 -0700
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
References: <20110726125042.1180.12955.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4E2EBA34.5090604@stpeter.im> <4E44A777.3000902@gmail.com> <01O4SNTZFJZ200VHKR@mauve.mrochek.com> <4E4BD33E.6050002@gmail.com> <01O4Y7R78O5000VHKR@mauve.mrochek.com> <4E4CAA4B.6070100@gmail.com> <01O4ZN66MODE00RCTX@mauve.mrochek.com>
In-Reply-To: <01O4ZN66MODE00RCTX@mauve.mrochek.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:11:59 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-saintandre-xdash-03.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:11:03 -0000

On 8/18/2011 8:36 AM, Ned Freed wrote:
>> But x. convention and vnd. convention are quite contiguous;
>
> I don't know what this is suppposed to mean. These are separate namespaces,
> each with it's own rules. They are adjacent in some ways, opposites in some
> ways, and disjoint in some ways.


This specification covers X- usage.  It covers nothing else.  That includes not 
covering its "neighbors".

In the most literal sense, those are out of scope.

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email