IETF Logo Mail Archive

[apps-review] Directorate

SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Fri, 23 September 2011 22:34 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B8821F8B88 for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 15:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.58
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.58 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.019, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7jI2rbw57+Qz for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 15:34:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.elandsys.com (mail.elandsys.com [208.69.177.125]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E71521F8AFE for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 15:34:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.239.67]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.elandsys.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p8NMbJGl004294 for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 15:37:25 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1316817446; bh=mVFGzPiYmeViAWORBtKMGBcyBW8=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=lIdjGAhq2ZnezUFwhcc3zmzcy0bMWWSbkE7kW51CcQsJZE9jv1RUEEsYTqNtBKanq kafWiykBby6g+iA5BZz+mkxzLdze/eyhqEun1Eaxw2qjOnkKTjNsODKd+tOF9VKQXY 8wT4Q17ZuJmyu7ZpSsLGBqNqf0KY+pxQYuDWcRLA=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20110923145427.09b6c3b0@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 15:32:41 -0700
To: apps-review@ietf.org
From: SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: [apps-review] Directorate
X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-review>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 22:34:57 -0000

Hello,

Most IETF areas have a directorate.  In the Applications Area, there 
are the LDAP and XML Directorates.  The only two review teams are 
Gen-ART and this team.  I welcome your advice on whether it would be 
better if the review team is turned into a directorate.  The 
advantages I can think of are:

  - It helps in your day job.

  - It may influence more reviewers to join the team.

  - I can ask you to do more early reviews. :-)

I have not asked Apps ADs what they think about the idea.

Best regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email