Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy

"Roni Even (A)" <roni.even@huawei.com> Tue, 14 January 2020 06:48 UTC

Return-Path: <roni.even@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7689512006E; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 22:48:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qG-EDZZeKNmt; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 22:48:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30334120052; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 22:48:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id DCD74E766399E78A8842; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 06:48:13 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DGGEMM401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.209) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 06:48:13 +0000
Received: from DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.174]) by DGGEMM401-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.3.20.209]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 14:48:06 +0800
From: "Roni Even (A)" <roni.even@huawei.com>
To: IAB Chair <iab-chair@iab.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "architecture-discuss@ietf.org" <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>, "iab@iab.org" <iab@iab.org>
Thread-Topic: Draft IAB conflict of interest policy
Thread-Index: AQHVxnmcMA59x5ePZEqHjbTI+oboiafpvZYQ
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 06:48:05 +0000
Message-ID: <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD27D56B76@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <4e888f0a-a1e8-df72-cbbc-9a2e2f0d0d05@iab.org>
In-Reply-To: <4e888f0a-a1e8-df72-cbbc-9a2e2f0d0d05@iab.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.200.203.63]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD27D56B76DGGEMM506MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/6S6s6pDeHq362JJ8geffNERRQUw>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 06:48:21 -0000

Hi,
After reading carefully this proposal and the discussion my personal view is that this proposal is very reasonable.
I expect from the  IAB members and also any person in leadership position in the IETF to behave based on these guidelines.
I see this proposal as guidelines , there are no penalties for not following these guidelines and  it is good. I expect that persons in leadership position will follows such COI policy even if it is not written.

Roni Even

From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of IAB Chair
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2020 1:15 AM
To: ietf@ietf.org; architecture-discuss@ietf.org; iab@iab.org
Subject: Draft IAB conflict of interest policy


Dear Colleagues,

The IAB is considering adoption of the conflict of interest policy below.  If you have comments on this draft policy, please send them to iab@iab.org<mailto:iab@iab.org>.

best regards,
Ted Hardie
for the IAB


INTERNET ARCHITECTURE BOARD CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY

This policy covers the nomcom-selected Internet Architecture Board (IAB) members and ex-officio members (collectively, “Covered Individuals”). This policy has no impact on any other participants in IAB activities, for instance liaisons to and from the IAB or IAB program members.

In carrying out their IAB role, Covered Individuals must act in the best interest of the Internet community. Occasionally this duty may be—or may appear to be—incompatible or in conflict with a Covered Individual’s personal interests (including interests of their family members), or the interests of an organization of which the Covered Individual is an employee, director, owner, or otherwise has business or financial interest. If a Covered Individual has a conflict of interest for whatever reason, that individual must avoid participating in the work of the IAB that touches on the related matter.

The IAB does not directly deal with matters relating to contracts or finance. The IAB does, however, have a role in personnel decisions, and its decisions and outputs have a potential to indirectly affect contracts within the IETF system. IAB's technical decisions and outputs have also a potential to impact both work elsewhere in the IETF and businesses that employ or develop Internet technology.

Covered Individuals shall not use the IAB’s resources or decisions as a means for personal or third-party gain.

Disclosure of Actual or Potential Conflicts

The IAB requires that all Covered Individuals disclose their main employment, sponsorship, consulting customer, or other sources of income when joining the IAB or whenever there are updates.

In addition, when a topic is discussed at the IAB, the Covered Individuals are required to promptly disclose if that topic constitutes a perceived or potential conflict of interest. Once disclosed, Covered Individuals may recuse from participation in discussions or decisions at their discretion.

The specific conflicts that may cause a perceived or potential conflict of interest are matters for individual and IAB judgment, but generally come in the following forms:

·      A personnel decision relates to the Covered Individual, a colleague that the Covered Individual's works closely with, or a family member. For the purposes of this policy, a "person working closely with" is someone working in the same team or project, or a direct manager or employee of the Covered Individual. And "family" means a spouse, domestic partner, child, sibling, parent, stepchild, stepparent, and mother-, father-, son-, daughter-, brother-, or sister-in-law, and any other person living in the same household, except tenants and household employees.

·      A decision or output from the IAB impacts a contract that the IETF enters into with a party, and that party relates to the Covered Individual, a colleague that the Covered Individual's works closely with, or a family member.

·      Activity on the IAB involves discussion and decisions regarding technical matters, mainly related to IETF activities. As an activity adjacent to a standardization process, it is often the case that Covered Individuals will have some (frequently non-financial) stake in the outcome of discussions or decisions that relate to technical matters. This policy does not require that Covered Individuals disclose such conflicts of interest as they relate to technical matters. However, Covered Individuals need to exercise their judgment and, in extraordinary cases be willing to disclose potential or perceived conflicts of interest even as they relate to technical matters. For example, if a Covered Individual's sponsor were in the process of entering a new market where there is an ongoing IAB discussion, then disclosure, or even recusal, might be appropriate, even if difficult.

Disclosure Transparency

A person's recusal to participate in the discussion of a topic is always noted in the public IAB minutes. In addition, the IAB will maintain a repository of all general disclosures of employment and other sponsorship. It is expected that much of this repository is public, but there can be situations where some disclosures (such as customers of consultants) are private.


<https://github.com/jariarkko/alternate-iab-coi-policy/blob/master/coi-policy.md#status>