Re: [arch-d] [Chirp] on the nature of architecture discussion (was: Re: Fwd: IETF 107 Vancouver In-Person Meeting Cancelled)

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

(dropping the chirp list...)

On 02/04/2020 17:37, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> 
> I am complaining about the absence of a recurring, IAB organized
> architecture-discuss/dispatch meeting slot at IETF meetings.

Ok, I think I now get  what you're after. Not sure I'm
convinced it'd be worthwhile, but if people wanted to
try that, then saying so, and I guess suggesting topics
to cover would be the things to do I guess. Then the
IAB could think about that input and whether such
sessions might be a good idea or not.

S.

> 
> If we had this, then you could indicate that 'chirp' contributions are
> a preferred topic to be presented/discussed in such a track.
> 
> You do encourage contributions by giving them these incentices:
> recurring meeting with longer time horizon: ability to plan putting cycles
> into a contribution. Present in a larger context of an arch-discuss
> track == reach out to more opportunistic participants.
> 
> Cheers
>     Toerless
> 
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 04:32:05PM +0100, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>
>> Hiya,
>>
>> On 02/04/2020 16:27, Toerless Eckert wrote:
>>> Why not ?
>>
>> I'd be really happy to organise a meeting for chirp. [1]
>> If people want one, just mail me or that list.
>>
>> But, I asked on the list already, as I just said, and
>> only 1 person was interested, so I'm very puzzled as
>> to what it is you are complaining about.
>>
>> S.
>>
>> [1] https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/chirp
>>
>>
> 
> pub   RSA 4096/7B172BEA 2017-12-22 Stephen Farrell (2017) <[e-mail]>
>> sub   RSA 4096/36CB8BB6 2017-12-22
>>
> 
> 
> 
>