IETF Logo Mail Archive

[art] Thank you! -- Re: [core] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-core-problem-details-05

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 28 June 2022 15:15 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03649C14CF0A; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 08:15:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AKQMJM1mEIDf; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 08:15:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAB41C1527AF; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 08:15:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p5089ad4f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.173.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4LXSnq0NbTzDCbY; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 17:15:11 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <4207E390-270A-463B-A38A-063AD2436370@tzi.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 17:15:10 +0200
Cc: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, Core WG mailing list <core@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-core-problem-details.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, "\"Martin J. Dürst\"" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 678122110.4600281-0ed0a5df75b1c729eb2097cd75708cf3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <16D5BCD8-769A-41C0-A178-6893678CB526@tzi.org>
References: <165511479760.19573.12671700576299137749@ietfa.amsl.com> <63D13796-758D-469B-AFA8-3050C9F87819@tzi.org> <dde9d36c-61e5-afcc-e15a-787c99d5fba9@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <0012F049-354A-4450-B923-857D24AB9459@tzi.org> <90b785ef-934b-da9d-7d89-7018bdebbb75@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <B96E980A-72E3-4678-B214-8464958845BB@tzi.org> <ff5f8ff1-67fc-eead-6b38-62c8d64ebf45@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4207E390-270A-463B-A38A-063AD2436370@tzi.org>
To: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/wAyXw0hitTDGyTTUzKNHjgNW8kI>
Subject: [art] Thank you! -- Re: [core] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-core-problem-details-05
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 15:15:16 -0000

To everyone who participated in the recent discussion on the i18n details of the core-problem-details specification:  Thank you for your input, which resulted in further improvements of the document.

The authors have now submitted -07 (links below), with a view of getting this specification approved this week.

It is always a bit frustrating to engage in a late-stage discussion of a draft, and more so if there external timelines that make quick resolution of issues a priority.  We can still make the end-of-June deadline for this specification to be picked up by 3GPP in their next release.

But I also think we now have a solid foundation for including at least some forms of human-readable text in future CBOR-based data formats, which should enable us to make indications of language and directionality more of a routine occurrence even in constrained environments.

Grüße, Carsten



The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-problem-details/

There is also an HTML version available at:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-core-problem-details-07.html

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-core-problem-details-07

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email