Re: [Asrg] Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3)

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 08 February 2010 14:13 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42AF93A73CF for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 06:13:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -13.753
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.753 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-4.307, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_DB=0.888, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d7tBeecJqq-3 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 06:13:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (64.57.183.53.lightlink.com [64.57.183.53]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350B43A73D6 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 06:13:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 53986 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2010 14:14:04 -0000
Received: from mail1.iecc.com (208.31.42.56) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 8 Feb 2010 14:14:04 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=k1002; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=+xyclgoxr851OTiQQS/7/YUscT6vll/N5AYlRGoW1ik=; b=ibe+D39KfkaoBXZB8+OI3O7YUxB4LyV99PCzLKYrg5N9EUJIvPacHEiEDIqEPKWHc0jl3khKcB2m1enAZX4+OgeBvOZ6REC6OSMfOnOQN9x0BqTSNV+UkyaGvJXT1anr1c8pwziuImQlkcdG/J1ej5EMOcA38XULF2CljTBX2vw=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=k1002; bh=+xyclgoxr851OTiQQS/7/YUscT6vll/N5AYlRGoW1ik=; b=IlNuDZqDl3Zy7lDQJ5BouXaAAKVW4ynO9DBfFVji7gBBSROvkYbY28bjoIhbGoulfo430nDafpLhOTJcqs0Gh93Hh+EW9lCCHvO3bkFlMtskG2fmRSEfhQmOZB1k90esHvP4mdbwOrvwsQ6gxC45zDT3q83lv6awjlv3/E+4GrI=
Date: 8 Feb 2010 14:14:03 -0000
Message-ID: <20100208141403.36981.qmail@simone.iecc.com>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: asrg@irtf.org
In-Reply-To: <4B6DB6D1.5050805@dcrocker.net>
Organization:
Cc:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3)
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:13:03 -0000

>      [1]  Is the same as for submitting regular new mail, that is, normal
>           posting.  (Determination of the address to send to is a separate
>           issue.)
>
>
>      [2]  Is specific to the mechanism for retrieving the message for which a
>           report is being submitted.  (The details of such mechanisms is a
>           separate issue.)

Has to be [1], to make it work reasonably for the legions of POP users.

R's,
John