IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-criteria (was Re: request for review for a non FUSSP proposal)

"J.D. Falk" <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org> Fri, 26 June 2009 20:05 UTC

Return-Path: <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B2F43A6BA7 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:05:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.400, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LVc-4Uafv1NN for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:05:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ocelope.disgruntled.net (ocelope.disgruntled.net [97.107.131.76]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5DD3A6B07 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:05:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rpco-jdmacbook.local (97-122-151-2.hlrn.qwest.net [97.122.151.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by ocelope.disgruntled.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n5QK5pnP009912 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <asrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:05:56 -0600
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.6.0 ocelope.disgruntled.net n5QK5pnP009912
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=cybernothing.org; s=satori; t=1246046756; bh=azVgFVL9z37qzSil2sM5YVxL+cM1RC0762AyzTV9 ZJo=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Tk71NnkZdzk2 mstUKJGvYsw/WwCoNpOL3mdbadbWvyLqNFTDJkiAJN2CVWTh9rEUt+YfHZ2WEtvb2fo h8IoW9vdJdKwvziuIaNYCpKBMMaOkR52FDo7+1++gYhLXVMzF7xh0JPNqrdYUMSlA0s QPBUv+2m/OMKHFcGQEFn20g70=
Message-ID: <4A452A12.2070302@cybernothing.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:05:38 -0600
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 1.0b12 (Macintosh/2009051120)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
References: <4A43B696.2000106@cybernothing.org> <4A449A7C.6070106@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <4A449A7C.6070106@tana.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-criteria (was Re: request for review for a non FUSSP proposal)
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:05:40 -0000

Alessandro Vesely wrote:

> However, I think an it could, and should, go beyond that. For
> example, why is it not in the scope of that document "to attempt to
> distinguish or justify any more detailed definition of [the term spam]"?

Because attempting to define "spam" is the very best way to ensure that a 
document is never finished.

-- 
J.D. Falk
Return Path Inc
http://www.returnpath.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email