IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-criteria (was Re: request for review for a non FUSSP proposal)

Douglas Otis <dotis@mail-abuse.org> Fri, 26 June 2009 20:39 UTC

Return-Path: <dotis@mail-abuse.org>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04D3D3A6BA5 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:39:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.006
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.006 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.206, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uw9ytdYGqyHU for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:39:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from harry.mail-abuse.org (harry.mail-abuse.org [168.61.5.27]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E0053A6977 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:39:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (gateway1.sjc.mail-abuse.org [168.61.5.81]) by harry.mail-abuse.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1540A94439 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:29:01 +0000 (UTC)
Message-Id: <7C1229F5-0346-4FC6-98D2-41BE2BA70EBA@mail-abuse.org>
From: Douglas Otis <dotis@mail-abuse.org>
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
In-Reply-To: <4A452A12.2070302@cybernothing.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:29:01 -0700
References: <4A43B696.2000106@cybernothing.org> <4A449A7C.6070106@tana.it> <4A452A12.2070302@cybernothing.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
Subject: Re: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-criteria (was Re: request for review for a non FUSSP proposal)
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:39:36 -0000

On Jun 26, 2009, at 1:05 PM, J.D. Falk wrote:

> Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>
>> However, I think an it could, and should, go beyond that. For  
>> example, why is it not in the scope of that document "to attempt to  
>> distinguish or justify any more detailed definition of [the term  
>> spam]"?
>
> Because attempting to define "spam" is the very best way to ensure  
> that a document is never finished.

Agreed.

-Doug

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email