Re: [Asrg] 6 - Yahoo Domain Keys

Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> Thu, 20 May 2004 02:02 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (www.iesg.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA05376 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 19 May 2004 22:02:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BQcrZ-0003w1-Mp for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 22:00:49 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i4K20nSX015123 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 22:00:49 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BQcjP-000298-9I for asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 21:52:23 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA04892 for <asrg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 May 2004 21:52:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BQcjM-0005Xu-BT for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 21:52:20 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BQciX-0005Pk-00 for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 21:51:30 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BQchg-0005Gg-00 for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 21:50:36 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BQcWU-0007dz-4F; Wed, 19 May 2004 21:39:02 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BQcRx-0006RH-Vi for asrg@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 21:34:21 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA04201 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 May 2004 21:34:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BQcRv-00037Z-4L for asrg@ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 21:34:19 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BQcRA-0002xq-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 21:33:32 -0400
Received: from mail1.panix.com ([166.84.1.72]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BQcQI-0002mh-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 21:32:38 -0400
Received: from panix5.panix.com (panix5.panix.com [166.84.1.5]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3ACD4871C for <asrg@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 May 2004 21:32:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from sethb@localhost) by panix5.panix.com (8.11.6p2-a/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) id i4K1Wak22818; Wed, 19 May 2004 21:32:36 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200405200132.i4K1Wak22818@panix5.panix.com>
From: Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com>
To: asrg@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <16556.612.191252.768845@world.std.com> (message from Barry Shein on Wed, 19 May 2004 20:57:08 -0400)
Subject: Re: [Asrg] 6 - Yahoo Domain Keys
References: <40AAB82D.3090004@solidmatrix.com> <GPEMJLCHICHEGPOKJHHDCELEHPAA.asrg@rebel.com.au> <16555.56412.585254.961521@world.std.com> <200405192314.i4JNEpx06794@panix5.panix.com> <16556.612.191252.768845@world.std.com>
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/asrg/>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 21:32:36 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60

Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com> top-posted:

> Well, everyone keeps saying this but I don't particularly see why this
> should be the case. I'm sure some, even many, such ISPs will do as you
> say but are you really going to vouchsafe for all those broadband and
> dialup ISPs currently a source of so many problems?

The ones that are too fucking cheap, stupid, and/or lazy to do
anything about their infected lusers spamming and emitting worms?
They're going to go to a lot of extra effort to allow their idiot
lusers to spam?  I don't think so.

Seth


_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg