Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9557 <draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-11> for your review

Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrheenen@amsl.com> Mon, 15 April 2024 18:04 UTC

Return-Path: <rvanrheenen@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BE7EC14CE2C; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 11:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id od1RY1dWnRBi; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 11:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCD06C14CEFD; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 11:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9C0424B455; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 11:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kwgpCfjo6J0Y; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 11:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2601:641:300:5fb0:71a8:ebef:6a0e:dd19] (unknown [IPv6:2601:641:300:5fb0:71a8:ebef:6a0e:dd19]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 60AB3424B427; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 11:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrheenen@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <db95c649-dc1e-4324-b901-1461e589f988@igalia.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 11:04:02 -0700
Cc: Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, sedate-ads@ietf.org, sedate-chairs@ietf.org, Mark McFadden <Mark@internetpolicyadvisors.com>, Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>, "auth48archive@rfc-ed" <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B4E84CB9-F0B8-4A1F-91D2-D25E6060AFFD@amsl.com>
References: <20240312020857.BB09C191A4A3@rfcpa.amsl.com> <5F5DE402-52EB-4D24-AF8A-D6467917DF11@tzi.org> <CD607473-2982-4D5B-AF6E-E4BED86DB5AC@amsl.com> <A725C2FF-A365-4D86-8F10-C86F1E72676E@tzi.org> <93B26FD7-B3EA-4EFA-AB2C-A34AE416C7CB@amsl.com> <F6596E8C-B5BE-43E7-A6E4-6C7D157A51BB@tzi.org> <EA3026D6-E0A1-4897-86D1-62B3BFE0BD7E@amsl.com> <5FEB859A-86E7-4E18-BA10-2D09E6CC3539@amsl.com> <16BB7AD0-8BA8-4E9D-B149-5AF04CCBDFF1@tzi.org> <874CEDAD-68A2-4904-9B6E-F2FFB2C72FE5@amsl.com> <6681B520-8184-45DC-9636-B992093EC5FB@tzi.org> <2490729F-E726-425F-9120-02810C26F6DB@amsl.com> <7D4E4AB4-8E73-47A5-B7FD-F271187ABB16@amsl.com> <e57c84c6-51d8-415f-87dd-ec5bf45d45a1@igalia.com> <2AF15CEB-0156-42B3-8535-27FBBDA19FE4@amsl.com> <5ba407e6-c38c-4c5a-aa90-2ee968277ee4@igalia.com> <AEB58485-FBCC-432E-BFC2-FE7879259CC7@amsl.com> <db95c649-dc1e-4324-b901-1461e589f988@igalia.com>
To: Ujjwal Sharma <ryzokuken@igalia.com>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/0au6Stv5aRnuMkBEog2fRFxBHL0>
Subject: Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9557 <draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-11> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 18:04:09 -0000

H Ujjwal,

Thank you for the quick reply! No need to apologize - we appreciate your comments. We have updated the text in the “Scope” section. Please let us know if you have any further comments or if you approve the document in its current form.

The files have been posted here (please refresh):
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557.txt
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557.pdf
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557.html
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557.xml

The relevant diff files are posted here:
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557-diff.html (comprehensive diff)
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557-auth48diff.html (all AUTH48 changes) 
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557-lastdiff.html (htmlwdiff diff between last version and this)
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557-lastrfcdiff.html (rfcdiff between last version and this)

For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see:
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9557

Thank you,
RFC Editor/rv


> On Apr 15, 2024, at 4:25 AM, Ujjwal Sharma <ryzokuken@igalia.com> wrote:
> 
> On 15/04/2024 7:58 a.m., Rebecca VanRheenen wrote:
>> Hi Ujjwal,
>> Thank you for your comments. We made the updates you suggest (see list of files below) but have some followup questions as well:
> 
> Hi Rebecca! Thanks a ton for your updates and in hindsight I realize that I skimped on the processes a little bit so my apologies for that.
> 
>>> * In Scope, the "For this, …" starting the second sentence seems awkwardly worded.
>> Would deleting “For this" be an improvement? Or do you have another suggestion?
>> Current:
>>    [RFC3339] defines a syntax for timestamps to represent date and time
>>    in the Internet.  For this, the present document defines an extension
>>    syntax that achieves the following properties:
>> Perhaps:
>>    [RFC3339] defines a syntax for timestamps to represent date and time
>>    in the Internet.  The present document defines an extension
>>    syntax that achieves the following properties:
> 
> The text seems easier to read so I support your proposal.
> 
>>> * In Definitions, for Z, I disagree with altering the exact literal text of RFC 3339 while claiming that document as its source.
>> Please discuss with Carsten and let us know how to update this. We see that the changes to this defintion were proposed by Carsten in response to question #4 in the initial set of questions.
>> Original:
>>    Z:  A suffix which, when applied to a time, denotes a UTC offset of
>>       00:00; often spoken "Zulu" from the ICAO phonetic alphabet
>>       representation of the letter "Z".  (Definition from Section 2 of
>>       [RFC3339]; see [ICAO-PA] for the phonetic alphabet.)
>> Current:
>>    Z:  A suffix that, when applied to a time, denotes a UTC offset of
>>       00:00; often pronounced "Zulu" from the ICAO phonetic alphabet
>>       representation of the letter "Z".  (The definition is from
>>       Section 2 of [RFC3339]; see the International Civil Aviation
>>       Organization (ICAO) document [ICAO-PA] for the phonetic alphabet
>>       mentioned.)
> 
> After some discussion with Carsten, I have realized that it was inappropriate of me to nitpick this text and I'd like to withdraw my suggestions. I think it's best for this text to remain as-is.
> 
> In conclusion, my apologies again for floating a whole bunch of comments at the last minute in a hurry without proper consideration and my thanks for handling them so very well. I'm quite happy with the editorial shape of the draft now.
> 
> Cheers,
> Ujjwal
> 
> -- 
> Ujjwal "Ryzokuken" Sharma (he/him)
> 
> Compilers Hacker at Igalia
>