IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9557 <draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-11> for your review

Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com> Tue, 02 April 2024 22:24 UTC

Return-Path: <apaloma@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B418CC151070; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 15:24:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ClwPVNM2hh8A; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 15:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB4FBC14CEFD; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 15:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E83424CD3F; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 15:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 71RowdLhmiY1; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 15:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2600:1700:65a2:2250:172:6860:d0a0:1bc3]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77140424CD01; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 15:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.400.31\))
From: Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <6681B520-8184-45DC-9636-B992093EC5FB@tzi.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 15:24:17 -0700
Cc: ryzokuken@igalia.com, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, sedate-ads@ietf.org, sedate-chairs@ietf.org, Mark McFadden <Mark@internetpolicyadvisors.com>, Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>, "auth48archive@rfc-ed" <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2490729F-E726-425F-9120-02810C26F6DB@amsl.com>
References: <20240312020857.BB09C191A4A3@rfcpa.amsl.com> <5F5DE402-52EB-4D24-AF8A-D6467917DF11@tzi.org> <CD607473-2982-4D5B-AF6E-E4BED86DB5AC@amsl.com> <A725C2FF-A365-4D86-8F10-C86F1E72676E@tzi.org> <93B26FD7-B3EA-4EFA-AB2C-A34AE416C7CB@amsl.com> <F6596E8C-B5BE-43E7-A6E4-6C7D157A51BB@tzi.org> <EA3026D6-E0A1-4897-86D1-62B3BFE0BD7E@amsl.com> <5FEB859A-86E7-4E18-BA10-2D09E6CC3539@amsl.com> <16BB7AD0-8BA8-4E9D-B149-5AF04CCBDFF1@tzi.org> <874CEDAD-68A2-4904-9B6E-F2FFB2C72FE5@amsl.com> <6681B520-8184-45DC-9636-B992093EC5FB@tzi.org>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.400.31)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/Tl6UPNNHs3ODECKa-JzOfrLEOD4>
Subject: Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9557 <draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-11> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 22:24:32 -0000

Hi Carsten,

We have updated the files per your request and noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page:
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9557

The files have been posted here (please refresh):
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557.txt
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557.pdf
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557.html
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557.xml

The relevant diff files are posted here:
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557-diff.html (comprehensive diff)
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557-auth48diff.html (all AUTH48 changes)
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557-lastdiff.html (htmlwdiff diff between last version and this)
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557-lastrfcdiff.html (rfcdiff between last version and this)

Once we’ve received Ujjwal’s approval, we with move forward with the publication process.

Thank you,
RFC Editor/ap

> On Apr 2, 2024, at 2:02 PM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Alanna,
> 
> thank you.
> 
> I have one final change that is needed:
> 
> OLD:
>   reference point for the specified time"; see <xref target="update"/>8.</t>
> NEW:
>   reference point for the specified time"; see <xref target="update"/>.</t>
> 
> Apologies for not noticing this earlier.
> 
> 
> Also, the addition of an article here was incomplete (generator and recipient are not the same):
> 
> OLD:
> As a generator and recipient may be using different revisions of the
> NEW:
> As a generator and a recipient may be using different revisions of the
> 
> 
> With these changes, I believe RFC 9557-to-be will be ready for publication.
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
> 
> 
>> On 2. Apr 2024, at 18:03, Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Carsten,
>> 
>> Thank you for the explanation. We will leave the original phrasing of the text as is. 
>> 
>> As all of our queries have now been addressed, we will await any further updates you may have as well as approvals from each party listed on the AUTH48 status page below prior to moving this document forward in the publication process.
>> 
>> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9557
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> RFC Editor/ap
> […]

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email