Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9557 <draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-11> for your review

[Ujjwal Sharma <[e-mail]>]

My apologies for the delay Alanna, I've known that the publication is 
currently blocked on my final approval and that gives me no joy. 
However, I've been stuck with some rather complicated issues at work and 
therefore couldn't get to it despite trying really hard. I'll let you 
know as soon as I'm done.

Best,
Ujjwal

On 09/04/2024 6:39 p.m., Alanna Paloma wrote:
> Hi Ujjwal,
> 
> This is a friendly reminder that we await your review and approval of this document.
> 
> The files have been posted here (please refresh):
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557.txt
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557.pdf
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557.html
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557.xml
> 
> The relevant diff files are posted here:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557-diff.html (comprehensive diff)
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557-auth48diff.html (all AUTH48 changes)
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557-lastdiff.html (htmlwdiff diff between last version and this)
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557-lastrfcdiff.html (rfcdiff between last version and this)
> 
> Once we’ve received your approval, we with move forward with the publication process.
> 
> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9557
> 
> Thank you,
> RFC Editor/ap
> 
>> On Apr 2, 2024, at 3:24 PM, Alanna Paloma <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Carsten,
>>
>> We have updated the files per your request and noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9557
>>
>> The files have been posted here (please refresh):
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557.txt
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557.pdf
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557.html
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557.xml
>>
>> The relevant diff files are posted here:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557-diff.html (comprehensive diff)
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557-auth48diff.html (all AUTH48 changes)
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557-lastdiff.html (htmlwdiff diff between last version and this)
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557-lastrfcdiff.html (rfcdiff between last version and this)
>>
>> Once we’ve received Ujjwal’s approval, we with move forward with the publication process.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> RFC Editor/ap
>>
>>> On Apr 2, 2024, at 2:02 PM, Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Alanna,
>>>
>>> thank you.
>>>
>>> I have one final change that is needed:
>>>
>>> OLD:
>>>   reference point for the specified time"; see <xref target="update"/>8.</t>
>>> NEW:
>>>   reference point for the specified time"; see <xref target="update"/>.</t>
>>>
>>> Apologies for not noticing this earlier.
>>>
>>>
>>> Also, the addition of an article here was incomplete (generator and recipient are not the same):
>>>
>>> OLD:
>>> As a generator and recipient may be using different revisions of the
>>> NEW:
>>> As a generator and a recipient may be using different revisions of the
>>>
>>>
>>> With these changes, I believe RFC 9557-to-be will be ready for publication.
>>>
>>> Grüße, Carsten
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 2. Apr 2024, at 18:03, Alanna Paloma <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Carsten,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for the explanation. We will leave the original phrasing of the text as is.
>>>>
>>>> As all of our queries have now been addressed, we will await any further updates you may have as well as approvals from each party listed on the AUTH48 status page below prior to moving this document forward in the publication process.
>>>>
>>>> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see:
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9557
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> RFC Editor/ap
>>> […]
>>
>>
> 
> 

-- 
Ujjwal "Ryzokuken" Sharma (he/him)

Compilers Hacker at Igalia