IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9557 <draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-11> for your review

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 02 April 2024 21:03 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A0E3C151070; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 14:03:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v5hg86yBwXDX; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 14:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A666C14CF1A; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 14:03:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (eduroam-0770.wlan.uni-bremen.de [134.102.19.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4V8L226XX5zDCdC; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 23:03:06 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <874CEDAD-68A2-4904-9B6E-F2FFB2C72FE5@amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 23:02:56 +0200
Cc: ryzokuken@igalia.com, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, sedate-ads@ietf.org, sedate-chairs@ietf.org, Mark McFadden <Mark@internetpolicyadvisors.com>, Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>, "auth48archive@rfc-ed" <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6681B520-8184-45DC-9636-B992093EC5FB@tzi.org>
References: <20240312020857.BB09C191A4A3@rfcpa.amsl.com> <5F5DE402-52EB-4D24-AF8A-D6467917DF11@tzi.org> <CD607473-2982-4D5B-AF6E-E4BED86DB5AC@amsl.com> <A725C2FF-A365-4D86-8F10-C86F1E72676E@tzi.org> <93B26FD7-B3EA-4EFA-AB2C-A34AE416C7CB@amsl.com> <F6596E8C-B5BE-43E7-A6E4-6C7D157A51BB@tzi.org> <EA3026D6-E0A1-4897-86D1-62B3BFE0BD7E@amsl.com> <5FEB859A-86E7-4E18-BA10-2D09E6CC3539@amsl.com> <16BB7AD0-8BA8-4E9D-B149-5AF04CCBDFF1@tzi.org> <874CEDAD-68A2-4904-9B6E-F2FFB2C72FE5@amsl.com>
To: Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.500.171.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/_GV73dPrlTiCjONfkWKlb3LhuOE>
Subject: Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9557 <draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-11> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 21:03:16 -0000

Hi Alanna,

thank you.

I have one final change that is needed:

OLD:
   reference point for the specified time"; see <xref target="update"/>8.</t>
NEW:
   reference point for the specified time"; see <xref target="update"/>.</t>

Apologies for not noticing this earlier.


Also, the addition of an article here was incomplete (generator and recipient are not the same):

OLD:
As a generator and recipient may be using different revisions of the
NEW:
As a generator and a recipient may be using different revisions of the


With these changes, I believe RFC 9557-to-be will be ready for publication.

Grüße, Carsten


> On 2. Apr 2024, at 18:03, Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Carsten,
> 
> Thank you for the explanation. We will leave the original phrasing of the text as is. 
> 
> As all of our queries have now been addressed, we will await any further updates you may have as well as approvals from each party listed on the AUTH48 status page below prior to moving this document forward in the publication process.
> 
> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9557
> 
> Thank you,
> RFC Editor/ap
[…]

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email