Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9557 <draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-11> for your review

[Alanna Paloma <[e-mail]>]

Hi Ujjwal,

This is a friendly reminder that we await your review and approval of this document. 

The files have been posted here (please refresh):
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557.txt
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557.pdf
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557.html
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557.xml

The relevant diff files are posted here:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557-diff.html (comprehensive diff)
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557-auth48diff.html (all AUTH48 changes)
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557-lastdiff.html (htmlwdiff diff between last version and this)
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557-lastrfcdiff.html (rfcdiff between last version and this)

Once we’ve received your approval, we with move forward with the publication process.

For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9557

Thank you,
RFC Editor/ap

> On Apr 2, 2024, at 3:24 PM, Alanna Paloma <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Carsten,
> 
> We have updated the files per your request and noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9557
> 
> The files have been posted here (please refresh):
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557.txt
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557.pdf
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557.html
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557.xml
> 
> The relevant diff files are posted here:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557-diff.html (comprehensive diff)
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557-auth48diff.html (all AUTH48 changes)
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557-lastdiff.html (htmlwdiff diff between last version and this)
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9557-lastrfcdiff.html (rfcdiff between last version and this)
> 
> Once we’ve received Ujjwal’s approval, we with move forward with the publication process.
> 
> Thank you,
> RFC Editor/ap
> 
>> On Apr 2, 2024, at 2:02 PM, Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Alanna,
>> 
>> thank you.
>> 
>> I have one final change that is needed:
>> 
>> OLD:
>>  reference point for the specified time"; see <xref target="update"/>8.</t>
>> NEW:
>>  reference point for the specified time"; see <xref target="update"/>.</t>
>> 
>> Apologies for not noticing this earlier.
>> 
>> 
>> Also, the addition of an article here was incomplete (generator and recipient are not the same):
>> 
>> OLD:
>> As a generator and recipient may be using different revisions of the
>> NEW:
>> As a generator and a recipient may be using different revisions of the
>> 
>> 
>> With these changes, I believe RFC 9557-to-be will be ready for publication.
>> 
>> Grüße, Carsten
>> 
>> 
>>> On 2. Apr 2024, at 18:03, Alanna Paloma <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Carsten,
>>> 
>>> Thank you for the explanation. We will leave the original phrasing of the text as is. 
>>> 
>>> As all of our queries have now been addressed, we will await any further updates you may have as well as approvals from each party listed on the AUTH48 status page below prior to moving this document forward in the publication process.
>>> 
>>> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see:
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9557
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> RFC Editor/ap
>> […]
> 
>