[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa-10> for your review

[Megan Ferguson <[e-mail]>]

Got it - thanks for the quick reply, Alan!

> On May 13, 2026, at 10:04 AM, Alan DeKok <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
>  It's Maria Ines Robles.  "Ignes" is a typo.  Please update the acknowledgements with her preferred name, and it's good to go.
> 
>> On May 13, 2026, at 8:57 AM, Megan Ferguson <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> Alan,
>> 
>> A quick pre-publication question:
>> 
>> In the Acknowledgments, I see "Ignes Robles”.  I happen to be working on another document that is acknowledging a “Maria Ines Robles” (who confirmed she prefers Maria Ines instead of just Ines just this week).  Is this the same person or should this remain Ignes?
>> 
>> Thank you.
>> 
>> Megan Ferguson
>> RFC Production Center
>> 
>>> On May 11, 2026, at 3:52 PM, Alan DeKok <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> It's all good.  Thanks!
>>> 
>>>> On May 11, 2026, at 2:39 PM, Megan Ferguson <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Alan,
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for sending.  We’ve rolled this change into our files linked below and updated your AUTH48 status to “Approved”.  We will send a separate request to IANA to update any necessary registry information to match the document.
>>>> 
>>>> One further pointer, we have updated the citations/references:
>>>> 
>>>> Was:
>>>> [EAP-METHOD]IANA, "Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Registry", <https://www.iana.org/assignments/eap-numbers>. 
>>>> 
>>>> [EAPREG]IANA, "Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Registry", <https://www.iana.org/assignments/eap-numbers>. 
>>>> 
>>>> Now (just one entry with the sub-registry names in running text):
>>>> [EAP-REG]IANA, "Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Registry", <https://www.iana.org/assignments/eap-numbers>.
>>>> 
>>>> Apologies for not spotting that these references were otherwise identical before.  If you have any objections, please let us know.  Otherwise, once we hear back from IANA, this document will be ready to move forward in the publication process.
>>>> 
>>>> The files have been posted here (please refresh):
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.txt
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.pdf
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.html
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.xml
>>>> 
>>>> The diff files have been posted here (please refresh):
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-diff.html
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-rfcdiff.html (side by side)
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-auth48diff.html
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side)
>>>> 
>>>> The AUTH48 status page is available here:
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9965
>>>> 
>>>> The AUTH48 cluster information is available here:
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/C558
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you.
>>>> 
>>>> Megan Ferguson
>>>> RFC Production Center
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On May 10, 2026, at 5:03 AM, Alan DeKok <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> One last nit:
>>>>> 
>>>>> OLD - Section 4
>>>>> ...
>>>>> Certificate Authorities (CAs) locally configured.
>>>>> 
>>>>> NEW
>>>>> ...
>>>>> Certification Authorities (CAs) locally configured.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have no other comments.  The document is approved once the above change is made.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On May 6, 2026, at 10:35 AM, Megan Ferguson <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks, Alan.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We have updated as suggested.  Let us know if any further changes are necessary. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Once we have your approval, we will contact IANA with any changes to make their registries consistent with the document.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The files have been posted here (please refresh):
>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.txt
>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.pdf
>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.html
>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.xml
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The diff files have been posted here (please refresh):
>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-diff.html
>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-rfcdiff.html (side by side)
>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-auth48diff.html
>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The AUTH48 status page is available here:
>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9965
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The AUTH48 cluster information is available here:
>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/C558
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Megan Ferguson
>>>>>> RFC Production Center
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On May 5, 2026, at 6:50 PM, Alan DeKok <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks.  Some minor nits:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Section 4.2
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> OLD
>>>>>>> This document defines an NAI called "[e-mail]", whi
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> NEW
>>>>>>> This document defines an NAI "[e-mail]", whi
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The word "called" was added during the editorial process.  The NAI isn't "called" something.  The document defines an NAI which has the value "[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>"
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The  [IEEE802.1X] reference can be updated to point to the 2020 version.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On May 5, 2026, at 8:16 PM, Megan Ferguson <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Alan and Dhruv,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thank you for your guidance.  We have cut the sentence as requested.  
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Alan - Please let us know if the [IEEE802.1X] reference entry should be updated to point to the 2020 version (I believe we asked about this in the companion document).  And please let us know if any further updates to the document are necessary.  
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Note - Once we have AUTH48 changes complete, we will send over any requests for IANA updates to IANA (prior to moving the document forward in the publication process).
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The files have been posted here (please refresh):
>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.txt
>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.pdf
>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.html
>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.xml
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The diff files have been posted here (please refresh):
>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-diff.html
>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-rfcdiff.html (side by side)
>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-auth48diff.html
>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The AUTH48 status page is available here:
>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9965
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The AUTH48 cluster information is available here:
>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/C558
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Megan Ferguson
>>>>>>>> RFC Production Center
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On May 5, 2026, at 11:32 AM, Alan DeKok <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On May 5, 2026, at 12:54 PM, Dhruv Dhody <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Based on this, the best way forward is to remove the sentence: 
>>>>>>>>>> “NOTE: As the controller of the arpa domain, the IAB has approved the allocation of eap.arpa.”
>>>>>>>>>> Please let us know if you see any concerns with that.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> +1 from me.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Alan DeKok.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>