[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa-10> for your review
Megan Ferguson <mferguson@staff.rfc-editor.org> Fri, 01 May 2026 18:59 UTC
Return-Path: <mferguson@staff.rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: auth48archive@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41988E77C26E for <auth48archive@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 1 May 2026 11:59:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1777661996; bh=ry3sXrNQ4UtkzCPSFUV1rofJ3Tl7NYta0mCdXRD/1ck=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=eZcT6Rw4YTEXWqNmxkW0p27weC5vop/gsx1u1pkPM3shn5jKbJebmJQC3KHgrB7fg yBo/VZDYT3Xwl9mz9vjEC3GFDLRx7c9mzsu//upvII1f34b8JC39TaQcXyyRZ/uFzX uq26Sk1LfLDcA2d/rE+vC4dq6Zgrp0/EBC/eOAyE=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=staff-rfc-editor-org.20251104.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29I4eIPUynOM for <auth48archive@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 1 May 2026 11:59:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32e.google.com (mail-ot1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC7DDE77C244 for <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 1 May 2026 11:59:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-7de4a9cb8eeso1902889a34.0 for <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 01 May 2026 11:59:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=staff-rfc-editor-org.20251104.gappssmtp.com; s=20251104; t=1777661993; x=1778266793; darn=rfc-editor.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=lUTV4qnRAVuxbQ/MPYfJi7KiBj7e8bwX0Rr1QVViAXE=; b=W6wq4tWKPr4/ZlHoMzxiUL6dRJ7CJMPMn/M2P4e9jrpD4/nD9nQ9zkVTUzSEiFw+k4 mZFYfQkVDbh1TnwfPEBBITaIoBfkuzk+nwAuGT9GdAgQVeLRJoy/hfjXB1G3AqhJJ+p3 rEic/SwBdbdH61emlU/MbaY4h8iO8yEJ7a0BjGXo2QqYCj+bWRQhfERhfAKE7nLZSFW4 sBb+G2qHgtC1V6UB9acOkXYHrVGL+HoMcC0gu/1wNT40N6PRxbYMdQSJCn5oU6hFuY8t UOtnpn7y733D1tgBnbMGAR+CN8rDH6s0baS+UBhR+pcaSoGMUDI9dlY0XL4lKkUCMbDM /D1g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1777661993; x=1778266793; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lUTV4qnRAVuxbQ/MPYfJi7KiBj7e8bwX0Rr1QVViAXE=; b=fSQMIB3GqVtu3pNPWmeExoouXWntNpBCsvdnggsu9H3fb0i9aEZaePkOMRmdDsJEek aNPTGI6KvX4y+NIUjn4JzZpcvp0jBgGglGR0OrceMEOc1b3YE19jREiY+k0GtrkWHPik 7g0xTsQlgLPdeKjhJqrka3k9wBbHnauKK5HaTibzs7wfXLLtyZdEQ22o/Dyb2yDHrFF8 DJukxW1B/qOxXsuzD4ajB+Vxevl4mXMOnnR1Y6ddPCTU9U1bmb6SFijrLd7PLvmsww8k B/D3tMG1pquCAO8j5dC89Br7ku/ZSROJuUlgLU8y5Ej81ma5KsIYzvix5HGJxqAmUP/5 M0ew==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ8lwo3uwfqNAmSO2wuXZYVjNpCVbDcrJlyT0AdEPfY9hPRXHY0JJSlu7k17tQBOG8Vg52P6ZT3PuiXIYFzD@rfc-editor.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwQUosTrXdBRSK7zHQdZXqbG3bOKAboBEYVr1I/IZqPNtSjEnra SjzuYqquCw61exNfkLnp5pxbIHsUho71kbmQNtbvnFk8gqze5b0qXHI4ZXLLyVtu4OHPtQ==
X-Gm-Gg: AeBDiesM8kJw0q/AwI1nKKk3jxFJiqzXcZ9CTozilhLvBWrzEB95zMjO3YgzxEQpVR+ 7BHxTrUXVCknxBHkM1AFuBkNUnyGTR42RJWJAWrbpm9V5qOUCu05q5P1m45aNgTH47Gb58JDrz3 A+5euAUz2w6adMVkF0eGLZ2E3qau+ZvT6Ba1rx2qbL9fGMUaW74B9fiL3GnQFRWgTBw1LcYD08s N4u/l+x/C1SuWt/hq8SWwRd/QdDol/kyHxepSUXwPTzPRrI0Dje4cMyG9YsrNRU6Bn63ylZizZ5 2tqwTIcIxeaKSnz/MFL3ixuL0rGtZaHdmeuycX9EV55FN/sakQL6azjzH4qgtVQs+kdZBkaXTiR RY4POM6qinzRlrHDBm/29gEm6Ky5e+xTsaRZtZLBs1Bk5AUg92rIolGQ/+fabPy41RT6yClPeY5 arnackXSLf6pXEwqyZFp7hWbqQ1HuEClCgsqeauzxRuamLS1Bx3WhUxBatNFQiB7qhk1hQdDwzT IHG89FANTsniusWXjnmKpjVSd44K/mlpJ7lSF5C
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:6b04:b0:7d7:fbe5:e9b3 with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-7dee11e6b2dmr529706a34.3.1777661993088; Fri, 01 May 2026 11:59:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-24-9-47-226.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [24.9.47.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 46e09a7af769-7decac26330sm2487986a34.13.2026.05.01.11.59.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 01 May 2026 11:59:52 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3864.400.21\))
From: Megan Ferguson <mferguson@staff.rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAP7zK5Y=YKNPVVsGU4vNGBCQpMchGDpwcyiKzBQ+zKofAU9gYg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 May 2026 12:59:41 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <341B1A31-FAEA-4986-8B62-CF49D09E4902@staff.rfc-editor.org>
References: <20260428045200.5BB6B2CCE7A@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org> <AE4F1940-DED6-4B7E-B409-A7E9AA6103A7@inkbridge.io> <4DE71DD0-6566-4F50-AE4B-C90A4390956C@staff.rfc-editor.org> <CAP7zK5Y=YKNPVVsGU4vNGBCQpMchGDpwcyiKzBQ+zKofAU9gYg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3864.400.21)
Message-ID-Hash: YVARTVTL3O5NK5FGETZ5EW4SRXUDU73O
X-Message-ID-Hash: YVARTVTL3O5NK5FGETZ5EW4SRXUDU73O
X-MailFrom: mferguson@staff.rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Dhruv Dhody <iab-chair@iab.org>, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, emu-ads@ietf.org, emu-chairs@ietf.org, peter@akayla.com, paul.wouters@aiven.io, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org, Alan DeKok <alan.dekok=40inkbridge.io@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa-10> for your review
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/iqkjFBpwgVNfDxuakIIXSYWOW9M>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:auth48archive-owner@rfc-editor.org>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:auth48archive-join@rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:auth48archive-leave@rfc-editor.org>
Hi Dhruv, We see the following in the minutes. We would benefit from additional guidance; it’s unclear to us who should be requesting formal approval. The minutes indicate that the document is the request. Should a separate request to the IAB come from the authors? Or perhaps from the EMU WG or the IESG because it’s an IETF doc? Is our asking about it on a public list sufficient? 3. Request for eap.arpa Wes Hardaker reported that EAP that will make a request for a delegation under .arpa; the request will be included in the IANA considerations section of a forthcoming document, and come to the IAB for approval at that point. Thank you. Megan Ferguson RFC Production Center > On May 1, 2026, at 5:15 AM, Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com> wrote: > > Hi Megan, > > This was discussed at the early stage back in 2020, and it was minuted at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-interim-2020-iab-18-20200617/. > > Now, we should receive an approval request so we can formally approve it. > > Thanks! > Dhruv > > On Fri, May 1, 2026 at 7:02 AM Megan Ferguson <mferguson@staff.rfc-editor.org> wrote: > IAB (Dhruv), > > Please see the following regarding this document: > > > >> > >> 5) <!-- [rfced] We had a few questions about the following: > >> > >> Original: > >> NOTE: the "arpa" domain is controlled by the IAB. Allocation of the > >> eap.arpa. domain name requires agreement from the IAB. > >> > >> a) We have updated this text as follows as requested in the RFC Editor > >> Note. Please review and let us know if you have any objections. > >> > >> Current: > >> As the controller of the "arpa" domain, the IAB has approved the > >> allocation of eap.arpa. > >> > >> b) We were curious if the reader might need a pointer to where this > >> agreement could be found? Or any further citation needed here? > >> --> > > > > I don't know of any official statement from the IAB. It would be worth double-checking with the IAB that they are aware of this request, and have approved it. > > > > Thank you. > > Megan Ferguson > RFC Production Center >
- [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-emu-e… rfc-editor
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… rfc-editor
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Alan DeKok
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Megan Ferguson
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… peter
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Megan Ferguson
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Dhruv Dhody
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Megan Ferguson
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Dhruv Dhody
- [auth48] Re: [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft… Megan Ferguson
- [auth48] Re: [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft… Dhruv Dhody
- [auth48] Re: [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft… Alan DeKok
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Megan Ferguson
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Alan DeKok
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Megan Ferguson
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Alan DeKok
- [auth48] Re: [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft… Megan Ferguson
- [auth48] [IANA #1451989] Re: [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-t… Amanda Baber via RT
- [auth48] Re: [IANA #1451989] [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-t… Megan Ferguson
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Megan Ferguson
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Alan DeKok
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Megan Ferguson
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Alan DeKok
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Megan Ferguson