[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa-10> for your review
Megan Ferguson <mferguson@staff.rfc-editor.org> Wed, 13 May 2026 15:58 UTC
Return-Path: <mferguson@staff.rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: auth48archive@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122E1EDCFCAA for <auth48archive@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 13 May 2026 08:58:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1778687893; bh=MZda+zugdVY6pKHTk5OaFgPIL4+pLXCnj5Qsvyh1EMQ=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=Oi/iRj8oIWFHj0DXkrdITAXydW8nbfuDMtF4OJP6W4Wp7WOE5c+YbaOyZTeSg3Iey r4PpGwgPcB/G9qBwW+UNUNf8WxtdmPbxqzi7GIGEDTjGW/tWxAdOToeVGyOB57QxIU 59euOaXmLHW+r0UKH4x4NcRypwwH1b6lcDbH2O+M=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=staff-rfc-editor-org.20251104.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id py6hqeYnkRt0 for <auth48archive@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 13 May 2026 08:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oo1-xc34.google.com (mail-oo1-xc34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c34]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42A19EDCFC77 for <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 13 May 2026 08:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oo1-xc34.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-69489b43d66so2005879eaf.2 for <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 13 May 2026 08:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=staff-rfc-editor-org.20251104.gappssmtp.com; s=20251104; t=1778687886; x=1779292686; darn=rfc-editor.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=LVE+MFlugbeJ6Y48ncZnKeCMxjhhNkeZklVS0DhgX8c=; b=sEVhoWWtjYKwgby0IAl9Gt68d+QNuKfI5JU/Ds4tJ6yxHmvOOOXleqTzLLCwKmkeTe YtdpwHBrHxjMpXPb/UxHk8QRhPLh/kEk1Ec21lBzr6Ql0fAwDYBFkKoGPnLV95BTF0P6 ZABjWhgCiFmou38AtTJuh1/KZ7PSQqDHv4u09ya0a+3RKJeZ02WhKq7B7LuLsUN0uwB8 Pvt9pUOu6/HvsSXmz1+GT6fXtwm1aXENs9KgJTwkit5CDmpc4a0CNxkMLRiSm8d8qjjn OX9GB6UAIvpf/XOKr9g0khvwM7hAMlt1d2h5o/v8rSediXBGtxk0qBTDOx1cGH9C/onH 5gPw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1778687886; x=1779292686; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=LVE+MFlugbeJ6Y48ncZnKeCMxjhhNkeZklVS0DhgX8c=; b=Zc2+EzxXGLsu8LGDDLjOtl0bPwHrFXGoZIb8wKed09VPMOpIE5j/TH+fiKdrKb5355 iz3qnLsqmkHBzDF8gTpjk68bWgE59uwHyXcA1r27gzS1pLiJWGFyAUKWEMkng3Fd193X GfxQhjB9j678XmBzVOhHPlFTWstuO8t5hZcgAll1D7R7YRiPeqs1UwGYk5bbTdxsKeWC RqaMRkhfn/NqGCT9RbpH0r1GeDiGpIILDi4MlwCFXR3BqlMtLdFjEtY8jrn4AEbDQ+f6 a9mB+A0JJDrzW9nS32QpOVchljaIE8b61sU1wugMsIikY/y0Tn2j7eFcFt5Otbcjumdf GKKQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ8VvCGSxvKlU7JpheocnBRGHkfiTNjYz6+VA8QKlU83MOuasuVhnMr7sdD/UY2CkEBStZ8ooxtHhIAk9g1Q@rfc-editor.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwfGFlLFoEMY+LJhpP+x9/YHI2gaUpdNDqJmnDw+nASrJN6SWE0 urCZl7w8DgZGQhIDMprkC556MqscaBeAYKU/3EanwpXuIyU1UcaB0n1cskjDlxxZFwZehw==
X-Gm-Gg: Acq92OFtr/cMu84DSZRg9+4EIyQWHgEtO+E6PaYOAizxcgCv/pw0n9UI1TCyfRHPooM DY9PJT2zYx1wPxLQVcKWk02yW9obPhrITlYtL53wgr8MGS7U11rU2QKwTAoO1TX813t4e7CZEFC D9xs9GUUv5mvRTo89zXr0FY0jdh/XEwU+IZzClejwfteXUcqozRpQubJ067ylvAC8fox5HRwY9e KE4Hl3P5nC2Lqn3DydgZUMtRGscP+vUnAL8xabPXPGzG+ItQHxfotDl6UPflad60Zy3Ln/MKZI3 aMGzWALjPzaZfbl85uGH+872qV/jQawQW4MPT9nGxULlLoIhXcRmULJbrKGSkgxNB2Nq+MuDXqI YCOs8WQfVy4Xl0KImlpmQ6Nlqsak9XgcIDlFaZFIhXQqKNNZ6Ly/ycFDt9a5f65NYakQwPnMA96 AF3TiOmrS9X3LgOkbS7YmD4AcN9WPyf//JYyTEz5KPdabyPhqhaM7pC6biRLfgOKPMUSNL35Otr deHI4YRoef/n5nrClk=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6820:198c:b0:696:573c:9f12 with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-69b78d01f44mr2030361eaf.4.1778687886429; Wed, 13 May 2026 08:58:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-24-9-47-226.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [24.9.47.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 586e51a60fabf-439c0954a81sm3222999fac.18.2026.05.13.08.58.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 13 May 2026 08:58:05 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3864.400.21\))
From: Megan Ferguson <mferguson@staff.rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <E0088D9D-7132-4947-8B42-559C1BAC2833@inkbridge.io>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 09:57:54 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B1A1F188-39A5-4ABA-93EC-302295AF1E40@staff.rfc-editor.org>
References: <20260428045200.5BB6B2CCE7A@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org> <AE4F1940-DED6-4B7E-B409-A7E9AA6103A7@inkbridge.io> <4DE71DD0-6566-4F50-AE4B-C90A4390956C@staff.rfc-editor.org> <CAP7zK5Y=YKNPVVsGU4vNGBCQpMchGDpwcyiKzBQ+zKofAU9gYg@mail.gmail.com> <341B1A31-FAEA-4986-8B62-CF49D09E4902@staff.rfc-editor.org> <CAP7zK5ZR7cTB0utg5iQji1n+Kw8pWVPVYrfwiLGR--bLUm==ZQ@mail.gmail.com> <AC1264A1-D72B-45C8-A296-DD26ADC1D659@staff.rfc-editor.org> <CAP7zK5b4NfpK+2nvgnYeFe4vL4zZ8P8H0Su8+uXgdNZ6WEQXCQ@mail.gmail.com> <F0D5B3E8-3F86-4A00-932F-82C9BD9808D9@inkbridge.io> <21BDF298-48C5-449F-96E2-235A4A779D3A@staff.rfc-editor.org> <984E53FC-C70C-4CD6-BD0B-119D65F708D1@inkbridge.io> <9069D129-4FBE-43AD-80B4-12F64CCB4ADF@staff.rfc-editor.org> <BE02B411-5A7B-4F32-A08F-BAC8284A9145@inkbridge.io> <AAF55262-E5E9-47E1-8073-17BA2C59CD9D@staff.rfc-editor.org> <E0088D9D-7132-4947-8B42-559C1BAC2833@inkbridge.io>
To: Alan DeKok <alan.dekok@inkbridge.io>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3864.400.21)
Message-ID-Hash: CLPFFK7Z7DHZDYC6XW2JLSRCAHVVCK5W
X-Message-ID-Hash: CLPFFK7Z7DHZDYC6XW2JLSRCAHVVCK5W
X-MailFrom: mferguson@staff.rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>, Dhruv Dhody <iab-chair@iab.org>, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, emu-ads@ietf.org, emu-chairs@ietf.org, peter@akayla.com, paul.wouters@aiven.io, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa-10> for your review
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/8GhLu18g6Zs381DtM8UNu2AbN6c>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:auth48archive-owner@rfc-editor.org>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:auth48archive-join@rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:auth48archive-leave@rfc-editor.org>
Alan, A quick pre-publication question: In the Acknowledgments, I see "Ignes Robles”. I happen to be working on another document that is acknowledging a “Maria Ines Robles” (who confirmed she prefers Maria Ines instead of just Ines just this week). Is this the same person or should this remain Ignes? Thank you. Megan Ferguson RFC Production Center > On May 11, 2026, at 3:52 PM, Alan DeKok <alan.dekok@inkbridge.io> wrote: > > It's all good. Thanks! > >> On May 11, 2026, at 2:39 PM, Megan Ferguson <mferguson@staff.rfc-editor.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Alan, >> >> Thanks for sending. We’ve rolled this change into our files linked below and updated your AUTH48 status to “Approved”. We will send a separate request to IANA to update any necessary registry information to match the document. >> >> One further pointer, we have updated the citations/references: >> >> Was: >> [EAP-METHOD]IANA, "Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Registry", <https://www.iana.org/assignments/eap-numbers>. >> >> [EAPREG]IANA, "Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Registry", <https://www.iana.org/assignments/eap-numbers>. >> >> Now (just one entry with the sub-registry names in running text): >> [EAP-REG]IANA, "Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Registry", <https://www.iana.org/assignments/eap-numbers>. >> >> Apologies for not spotting that these references were otherwise identical before. If you have any objections, please let us know. Otherwise, once we hear back from IANA, this document will be ready to move forward in the publication process. >> >> The files have been posted here (please refresh): >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.txt >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.pdf >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.xml >> >> The diff files have been posted here (please refresh): >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-diff.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-rfcdiff.html (side by side) >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-auth48diff.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side) >> >> The AUTH48 status page is available here: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9965 >> >> The AUTH48 cluster information is available here: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/C558 >> >> Thank you. >> >> Megan Ferguson >> RFC Production Center >> >> >>> On May 10, 2026, at 5:03 AM, Alan DeKok <alan.dekok@inkbridge.io> wrote: >>> >>> One last nit: >>> >>> OLD - Section 4 >>> ... >>> Certificate Authorities (CAs) locally configured. >>> >>> NEW >>> ... >>> Certification Authorities (CAs) locally configured. >>> >>> I have no other comments. The document is approved once the above change is made. >>> >>>> On May 6, 2026, at 10:35 AM, Megan Ferguson <mferguson@staff.rfc-editor.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Thanks, Alan. >>>> >>>> We have updated as suggested. Let us know if any further changes are necessary. >>>> >>>> Once we have your approval, we will contact IANA with any changes to make their registries consistent with the document. >>>> >>>> The files have been posted here (please refresh): >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.txt >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.pdf >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.html >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.xml >>>> >>>> The diff files have been posted here (please refresh): >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-diff.html >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-rfcdiff.html (side by side) >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-auth48diff.html >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side) >>>> >>>> The AUTH48 status page is available here: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9965 >>>> >>>> The AUTH48 cluster information is available here: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/C558 >>>> >>>> Thank you. >>>> >>>> Megan Ferguson >>>> RFC Production Center >>>> >>>>> On May 5, 2026, at 6:50 PM, Alan DeKok <alan.dekok@inkbridge.io> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Thanks. Some minor nits: >>>>> >>>>> Section 4.2 >>>>> >>>>> OLD >>>>> This document defines an NAI called "portal@tls.eap.arpa", whi >>>>> >>>>> NEW >>>>> This document defines an NAI "portal@tls.eap.arpa", whi >>>>> >>>>> The word "called" was added during the editorial process. The NAI isn't "called" something. The document defines an NAI which has the value "portal@tls.eap.arpa <mailto:portal@tls.eap.arpa>" >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The [IEEE802.1X] reference can be updated to point to the 2020 version. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On May 5, 2026, at 8:16 PM, Megan Ferguson <mferguson@staff.rfc-editor.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Alan and Dhruv, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you for your guidance. We have cut the sentence as requested. >>>>>> >>>>>> Alan - Please let us know if the [IEEE802.1X] reference entry should be updated to point to the 2020 version (I believe we asked about this in the companion document). And please let us know if any further updates to the document are necessary. >>>>>> >>>>>> Note - Once we have AUTH48 changes complete, we will send over any requests for IANA updates to IANA (prior to moving the document forward in the publication process). >>>>>> >>>>>> The files have been posted here (please refresh): >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.txt >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.pdf >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.html >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.xml >>>>>> >>>>>> The diff files have been posted here (please refresh): >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-diff.html >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-rfcdiff.html (side by side) >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-auth48diff.html >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side) >>>>>> >>>>>> The AUTH48 status page is available here: >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9965 >>>>>> >>>>>> The AUTH48 cluster information is available here: >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/C558 >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>> >>>>>> Megan Ferguson >>>>>> RFC Production Center >>>>>> >>>>>>> On May 5, 2026, at 11:32 AM, Alan DeKok <alan.dekok@inkbridge.io> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On May 5, 2026, at 12:54 PM, Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> Based on this, the best way forward is to remove the sentence: >>>>>>>> “NOTE: As the controller of the arpa domain, the IAB has approved the allocation of eap.arpa.” >>>>>>>> Please let us know if you see any concerns with that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 from me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Alan DeKok. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… rfc-editor
- [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-emu-e… rfc-editor
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Alan DeKok
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Megan Ferguson
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Megan Ferguson
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… peter
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Dhruv Dhody
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Megan Ferguson
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Dhruv Dhody
- [auth48] Re: [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft… Megan Ferguson
- [auth48] Re: [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft… Dhruv Dhody
- [auth48] Re: [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft… Alan DeKok
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Megan Ferguson
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Alan DeKok
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Megan Ferguson
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Alan DeKok
- [auth48] Re: [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft… Megan Ferguson
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Megan Ferguson
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Alan DeKok
- [auth48] [IANA #1451989] Re: [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-t… Amanda Baber via RT
- [auth48] Re: [IANA #1451989] [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-t… Megan Ferguson
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Megan Ferguson
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Alan DeKok
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Megan Ferguson