[auth48] Re: [IANA #1451989] [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa-10> for your review

[Megan Ferguson <[e-mail]>]

Hi Amanda,

Confirmed.  We will move this document forward in the publication process at this time.

Thank you.

Megan Ferguson
RFC Production Center

> On May 12, 2026, at 1:27 PM, Amanda Baber via RT <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This change is complete:
> 
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/eap-numbers
> 
> thanks,
> Amanda
> 
> On Mon May 11 21:36:54 2026, [e-mail] wrote:
>> IANA,
>> 
>> We’d like to request the following update for uniformity with this
>> document:
>> 
>> At https://www.iana.org/assignments/eap-numbers/eap-numbers.xhtml#eap-
>> provisioning-ids, an update to the column heading:
>> 
>> Old:
>> Method-Type
>> 
>> New:
>> Method Type
>> 
>> Please let us know when the updates have been completed.
>> 
>> Thank you.
>> 
>> Megan Ferguson
>> RFC Production Center
>> 
>>> On May 10, 2026, at 5:03 AM, Alan DeKok <[e-mail]>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> One last nit:
>>> 
>>> OLD - Section 4
>>> ...
>>> Certificate Authorities (CAs) locally configured.
>>> 
>>> NEW
>>> ...
>>> Certification Authorities (CAs) locally configured.
>>> 
>>> I have no other comments.  The document is approved once the above
>>> change is made.
>>> 
>>>> On May 6, 2026, at 10:35 AM, Megan Ferguson <[e-mail]-
>>>> editor.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks, Alan.
>>>> 
>>>> We have updated as suggested.  Let us know if any further changes
>>>> are necessary.
>>>> 
>>>> Once we have your approval, we will contact IANA with any changes to
>>>> make their registries consistent with the document.
>>>> 
>>>> The files have been posted here (please refresh):
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.txt
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.pdf
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.html
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.xml
>>>> 
>>>> The diff files have been posted here (please refresh):
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-diff.html
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-rfcdiff.html (side by
>>>> side)
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-auth48diff.html
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-auth48rfcdiff.html (side
>>>> by side)
>>>> 
>>>> The AUTH48 status page is available here:
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9965
>>>> 
>>>> The AUTH48 cluster information is available here:
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/C558
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you.
>>>> 
>>>> Megan Ferguson
>>>> RFC Production Center
>>>> 
>>>>> On May 5, 2026, at 6:50 PM, Alan DeKok <[e-mail]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks.  Some minor nits:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Section 4.2
>>>>> 
>>>>> OLD
>>>>> This document defines an NAI called "[e-mail]", whi
>>>>> 
>>>>> NEW
>>>>> This document defines an NAI "[e-mail]", whi
>>>>> 
>>>>> The word "called" was added during the editorial process.  The NAI
>>>>> isn't "called" something.  The document defines an NAI which has
>>>>> the value "[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>"
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> The  [IEEE802.1X] reference can be updated to point to the 2020
>>>>> version.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On May 5, 2026, at 8:16 PM, Megan Ferguson <[e-mail]-
>>>>>> editor.org> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Alan and Dhruv,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thank you for your guidance.  We have cut the sentence as
>>>>>> requested.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Alan - Please let us know if the [IEEE802.1X] reference entry
>>>>>> should be updated to point to the 2020 version (I believe we asked
>>>>>> about this in the companion document).  And please let us know if
>>>>>> any further updates to the document are necessary.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Note - Once we have AUTH48 changes complete, we will send over any
>>>>>> requests for IANA updates to IANA (prior to moving the document
>>>>>> forward in the publication process).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The files have been posted here (please refresh):
>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.txt
>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.pdf
>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.html
>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.xml
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The diff files have been posted here (please refresh):
>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-diff.html
>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-rfcdiff.html (side by
>>>>>> side)
>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-auth48diff.html
>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-auth48rfcdiff.html
>>>>>> (side by side)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The AUTH48 status page is available here:
>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9965
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The AUTH48 cluster information is available here:
>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/C558
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Megan Ferguson
>>>>>> RFC Production Center
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On May 5, 2026, at 11:32 AM, Alan DeKok <[e-mail]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On May 5, 2026, at 12:54 PM, Dhruv Dhody <[e-mail]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Based on this, the best way forward is to remove the sentence:
>>>>>>>> “NOTE: As the controller of the arpa domain, the IAB has
>>>>>>>> approved the allocation of eap.arpa.”
>>>>>>>> Please let us know if you see any concerns with that.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> +1 from me.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Alan DeKok.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>