[auth48] [IANA #1451989] Re: [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa-10> for your review
Amanda Baber via RT <iana-matrix@iana.org> Tue, 12 May 2026 19:27 UTC
Return-Path: <iana-shared@iana.org>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: auth48archive@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33920ED4FA8E; Tue, 12 May 2026 12:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1778614043; bh=GR5i5clcSuLxkQB8k+1Y3tmF5u/h95P9pmYmldlIs+Q=; h=Subject:From:Reply-To:In-Reply-To:References:To:CC:Date; b=Cy09o/9bu3wjHmPJo+FQ1E+8W2IKMJ++dDfIHItZngr0WyCcohaazy0PMWVNEI+Ex sh36ke1exd6wZ81n0HmJxajGn4xl5mZufaljXis8G/qysGEpc09HRI6f+Pc3y72XDT t8dPesQLIzNKtUoSIq/TvCKQHQ5E2z0T0YCygxjo=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.396
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.396 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=iana.org
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cv1av-jwMvC1; Tue, 12 May 2026 12:27:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org [192.0.33.81]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B84BED4FA7B; Tue, 12 May 2026 12:27:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from request7.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80288E1B35; Tue, 12 May 2026 19:27:17 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.lax.icann.org 80288E1B35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iana.org; s=202509s; t=1778614037; bh=BiLBcgVED/z/pe2omYoE5B/FNNBHxrYf4v5ssR47AiA=; h=Subject:From:Reply-To:In-Reply-To:References:To:CC:Date:From; b=U8m930xyKVdBgO5IKamElLW2PsmZVG1uYQp1Q2geazm+G/P9A4G9EHFCffHp6z3ig W5TZPCgmXlvOecIAFcGQpASMa3xANujutkR/HYVeHMu/QyYPvNe5DpR2k8nJ6wq6I7 NQFPEFinbGXgHORj5YtA0wsts2tzSCDHHmZCjWzA=
Received: by request7.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 7C8B7C097508; Tue, 12 May 2026 19:27:17 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: amanda.baber
From: Amanda Baber via RT <iana-matrix@iana.org>
In-Reply-To: <F03D4A0D-B7F6-4229-8165-62C9F1273389@staff.rfc-editor.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-1451989@icann.org> <20260428045200.5BB6B2CCE7A@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org> <AE4F1940-DED6-4B7E-B409-A7E9AA6103A7@inkbridge.io> <4DE71DD0-6566-4F50-AE4B-C90A4390956C@staff.rfc-editor.org> <CAP7zK5Y=YKNPVVsGU4vNGBCQpMchGDpwcyiKzBQ+zKofAU9gYg@mail.gmail.com> <21BDF298-48C5-449F-96E2-235A4A779D3A@staff.rfc-editor.org> <984E53FC-C70C-4CD6-BD0B-119D65F708D1@inkbridge.io> <9069D129-4FBE-43AD-80B4-12F64CCB4ADF@staff.rfc-editor.org> <BE02B411-5A7B-4F32-A08F-BAC8284A9145@inkbridge.io> <F03D4A0D-B7F6-4229-8165-62C9F1273389@staff.rfc-editor.org>
Message-ID: <rt-5.0.3-416774-1778614037-1171.1451989-37-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1451989
X-Managed-BY: RT 5.0.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
To: mferguson@staff.rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 19:27:17 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID-Hash: X7HOITIIDYM4O4C4PO3B6M3RJP2RCHWY
X-Message-ID-Hash: X7HOITIIDYM4O4C4PO3B6M3RJP2RCHWY
X-MailFrom: iana-shared@iana.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, peter@akayla.com, paul.wouters@aiven.io, iab-chair@iab.org, emu-chairs@ietf.org, emu-ads@ietf.org, dd@dhruvdhody.com, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org, alan.dekok@inkbridge.io
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Reply-To: iana-matrix@iana.org
Subject: [auth48] [IANA #1451989] Re: [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa-10> for your review
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/n6tXeXx2lYjaJ3YV0BYwlXdKNmY>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:auth48archive-owner@rfc-editor.org>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:auth48archive-join@rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:auth48archive-leave@rfc-editor.org>
Hi, This change is complete: https://www.iana.org/assignments/eap-numbers thanks, Amanda On Mon May 11 21:36:54 2026, mferguson@staff.rfc-editor.org wrote: > IANA, > > We’d like to request the following update for uniformity with this > document: > > At https://www.iana.org/assignments/eap-numbers/eap-numbers.xhtml#eap- > provisioning-ids, an update to the column heading: > > Old: > Method-Type > > New: > Method Type > > Please let us know when the updates have been completed. > > Thank you. > > Megan Ferguson > RFC Production Center > > > On May 10, 2026, at 5:03 AM, Alan DeKok <alan.dekok@inkbridge.io> > > wrote: > > > > One last nit: > > > > OLD - Section 4 > > ... > > Certificate Authorities (CAs) locally configured. > > > > NEW > > ... > > Certification Authorities (CAs) locally configured. > > > > I have no other comments. The document is approved once the above > > change is made. > > > >> On May 6, 2026, at 10:35 AM, Megan Ferguson <mferguson@staff.rfc- > >> editor.org> wrote: > >> > >> Thanks, Alan. > >> > >> We have updated as suggested. Let us know if any further changes > >> are necessary. > >> > >> Once we have your approval, we will contact IANA with any changes to > >> make their registries consistent with the document. > >> > >> The files have been posted here (please refresh): > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.txt > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.pdf > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.html > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.xml > >> > >> The diff files have been posted here (please refresh): > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-diff.html > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-rfcdiff.html (side by > >> side) > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-auth48diff.html > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-auth48rfcdiff.html (side > >> by side) > >> > >> The AUTH48 status page is available here: > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9965 > >> > >> The AUTH48 cluster information is available here: > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/C558 > >> > >> Thank you. > >> > >> Megan Ferguson > >> RFC Production Center > >> > >>> On May 5, 2026, at 6:50 PM, Alan DeKok <alan.dekok@inkbridge.io> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Thanks. Some minor nits: > >>> > >>> Section 4.2 > >>> > >>> OLD > >>> This document defines an NAI called "portal@tls.eap.arpa", whi > >>> > >>> NEW > >>> This document defines an NAI "portal@tls.eap.arpa", whi > >>> > >>> The word "called" was added during the editorial process. The NAI > >>> isn't "called" something. The document defines an NAI which has > >>> the value "portal@tls.eap.arpa <mailto:portal@tls.eap.arpa>" > >>> > >>> > >>> The [IEEE802.1X] reference can be updated to point to the 2020 > >>> version. > >>> > >>> > >>>> On May 5, 2026, at 8:16 PM, Megan Ferguson <mferguson@staff.rfc- > >>>> editor.org> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Alan and Dhruv, > >>>> > >>>> Thank you for your guidance. We have cut the sentence as > >>>> requested. > >>>> > >>>> Alan - Please let us know if the [IEEE802.1X] reference entry > >>>> should be updated to point to the 2020 version (I believe we asked > >>>> about this in the companion document). And please let us know if > >>>> any further updates to the document are necessary. > >>>> > >>>> Note - Once we have AUTH48 changes complete, we will send over any > >>>> requests for IANA updates to IANA (prior to moving the document > >>>> forward in the publication process). > >>>> > >>>> The files have been posted here (please refresh): > >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.txt > >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.pdf > >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.html > >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.xml > >>>> > >>>> The diff files have been posted here (please refresh): > >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-diff.html > >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-rfcdiff.html (side by > >>>> side) > >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-auth48diff.html > >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-auth48rfcdiff.html > >>>> (side by side) > >>>> > >>>> The AUTH48 status page is available here: > >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9965 > >>>> > >>>> The AUTH48 cluster information is available here: > >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/C558 > >>>> > >>>> Thank you. > >>>> > >>>> Megan Ferguson > >>>> RFC Production Center > >>>> > >>>>> On May 5, 2026, at 11:32 AM, Alan DeKok <alan.dekok@inkbridge.io> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> On May 5, 2026, at 12:54 PM, Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> Based on this, the best way forward is to remove the sentence: > >>>>>> “NOTE: As the controller of the arpa domain, the IAB has > >>>>>> approved the allocation of eap.arpa.” > >>>>>> Please let us know if you see any concerns with that. > >>>>> > >>>>> +1 from me. > >>>>> > >>>>> Alan DeKok. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… rfc-editor
- [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-emu-e… rfc-editor
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Alan DeKok
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Megan Ferguson
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Megan Ferguson
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… peter
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Dhruv Dhody
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Megan Ferguson
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Dhruv Dhody
- [auth48] Re: [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft… Megan Ferguson
- [auth48] Re: [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft… Dhruv Dhody
- [auth48] Re: [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft… Alan DeKok
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Megan Ferguson
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Alan DeKok
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Megan Ferguson
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Alan DeKok
- [auth48] Re: [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft… Megan Ferguson
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Megan Ferguson
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Alan DeKok
- [auth48] [IANA #1451989] Re: [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-t… Amanda Baber via RT
- [auth48] Re: [IANA #1451989] [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-t… Megan Ferguson
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Megan Ferguson
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Alan DeKok
- [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-e… Megan Ferguson