[auth48] Re: [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9965 <draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa-10> for your review

[Megan Ferguson <[e-mail]>]

IANA,

We’d like to request the following update for uniformity with this document:

At https://www.iana.org/assignments/eap-numbers/eap-numbers.xhtml#eap-provisioning-ids, an update to the column heading:

Old:
Method-Type

New:
Method Type 

Please let us know when the updates have been completed.

Thank you.

Megan Ferguson
RFC Production Center

> On May 10, 2026, at 5:03 AM, Alan DeKok <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
>  One last nit:
> 
> OLD - Section 4
> ...
> Certificate Authorities (CAs) locally configured.
> 
> NEW
> ...
> Certification Authorities (CAs) locally configured.
> 
>  I have no other comments.  The document is approved once the above change is made.
> 
>> On May 6, 2026, at 10:35 AM, Megan Ferguson <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks, Alan.
>> 
>> We have updated as suggested.  Let us know if any further changes are necessary. 
>> 
>> Once we have your approval, we will contact IANA with any changes to make their registries consistent with the document.
>> 
>> The files have been posted here (please refresh):
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.txt
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.pdf
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.html
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.xml
>> 
>> The diff files have been posted here (please refresh):
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-diff.html
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-rfcdiff.html (side by side)
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-auth48diff.html
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side)
>> 
>> The AUTH48 status page is available here:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9965
>> 
>> The AUTH48 cluster information is available here:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/C558
>> 
>> Thank you.
>> 
>> Megan Ferguson
>> RFC Production Center
>> 
>>> On May 5, 2026, at 6:50 PM, Alan DeKok <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>  Thanks.  Some minor nits:
>>> 
>>> Section 4.2
>>> 
>>> OLD
>>> This document defines an NAI called "[e-mail]", whi
>>> 
>>> NEW
>>> This document defines an NAI "[e-mail]", whi
>>> 
>>> The word "called" was added during the editorial process.  The NAI isn't "called" something.  The document defines an NAI which has the value "[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>"
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The  [IEEE802.1X] reference can be updated to point to the 2020 version.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On May 5, 2026, at 8:16 PM, Megan Ferguson <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Alan and Dhruv,
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you for your guidance.  We have cut the sentence as requested.  
>>>> 
>>>> Alan - Please let us know if the [IEEE802.1X] reference entry should be updated to point to the 2020 version (I believe we asked about this in the companion document).  And please let us know if any further updates to the document are necessary.  
>>>> 
>>>> Note - Once we have AUTH48 changes complete, we will send over any requests for IANA updates to IANA (prior to moving the document forward in the publication process).
>>>> 
>>>> The files have been posted here (please refresh):
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.txt
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.pdf
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.html
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965.xml
>>>> 
>>>> The diff files have been posted here (please refresh):
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-diff.html
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-rfcdiff.html (side by side)
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-auth48diff.html
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9965-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side)
>>>> 
>>>> The AUTH48 status page is available here:
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9965
>>>> 
>>>> The AUTH48 cluster information is available here:
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/C558
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you.
>>>> 
>>>> Megan Ferguson
>>>> RFC Production Center
>>>> 
>>>>> On May 5, 2026, at 11:32 AM, Alan DeKok <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On May 5, 2026, at 12:54 PM, Dhruv Dhody <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>>> Based on this, the best way forward is to remove the sentence: 
>>>>>> “NOTE: As the controller of the arpa domain, the IAB has approved the allocation of eap.arpa.”
>>>>>> Please let us know if you see any concerns with that.
>>>>> 
>>>>> +1 from me.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Alan DeKok.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>