IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9388 <draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types-11> for your review

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Tue, 27 June 2023 17:41 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2A0C151083; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 10:41:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0gbAAu38bnQo; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 10:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x634.google.com (mail-ej1-x634.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::634]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B821FC15107C; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 10:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x634.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-98de322d11fso104833766b.1; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 10:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1687887669; x=1690479669; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=B0/XbbyvwLo41MQKtg/IaRkJXknqUnT02MWIK4DCbSU=; b=SNP0bFVGI1lTDRgMDJm/Hv4ta/TVp8uc/OEGmtsLdBO2IBHVmREb22cRMvU4Kb2a+6 o4ch6Cy9txDn5AbzvLbB/E6UCMQFKu8wxZBFTJVNZUdlbFnmz1is56hNVVAlpXLyZXFL Ql1rO1cCBn0asy7ohUcEDuC/zKgOBnEVpaSE1lYejsD4RzgM7elHwMSSjEfb9du+yM6E mil2Vvc2NuhJHw32W/oQwKz7WemMwQQBlEZQQSsi0O0htGlCBKlryqSntwYo8mi21Tmi uiXzyfxcFU9eSNVgQ81yWB3CQSwmUQ/MgTA6aY6kY3OpWcXwrl8tFQKpFqWeZuZvNz9M 64vg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687887669; x=1690479669; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=B0/XbbyvwLo41MQKtg/IaRkJXknqUnT02MWIK4DCbSU=; b=ErC7FPp6IEt1J4Q93T51czEKLzJsJvi0z5DiH7KnO2iHyaQlVLVCAEGzqcWSMamEIh uolEExnsH4cnqthhO6EB01mKZrYxq5QUxS4sTfajeGvjN1OuFgsT9umTtKKuHZCet1GG X/66afIfl1HobRviPB/986VQjyycQVv24v3dfu9+1cNwPDnDbKVkKUsJXymGvy6+SOwI nwSnjOrG4YTlZNikCVnQ7tDizoZ1jg6AcZvkUNjaCVBat1FuUcwJFTzEeBXTuxzJeSpW 69bNlXPhe792Fe0ks+6BM0UpoEmCirE9s9CcKjnV21aRvJAO5wis2bNO2nlRs7ET4Dr6 Nsew==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwmyXOT+zJ3/cjeTpBf4a9LoP6XLQLBcw9XW/mkZHbToXroC7st JR/PW5cqT3XpdU6upDcBSqeLfPcnMCMxee42yPM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ7RYkNxBT8/FbXX9JyYQQo3o2G9FqiU4fhe8QxbmvsW1GxAh22aVMN/7i4KVTnn12iDY4ZnBFPLxLq5UYI5IYE=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5198:b0:987:6960:36c8 with SMTP id y24-20020a170906519800b00987696036c8mr23239611ejk.7.1687887668846; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 10:41:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230607032157.D1EA21978E66@rfcpa.amsl.com> <CAL0qLwaCCcCAFe=T7p6=odiQg0NaSjG35i9BaX+vFo6NRUxAPw@mail.gmail.com> <B6F1D8F7-8730-4EF5-8A22-44E26B12EE4F@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <B6F1D8F7-8730-4EF5-8A22-44E26B12EE4F@amsl.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 10:40:56 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZjnWgb5u5P2k71g9Fi91LSoCYwwyaxT+27WV-d9zL0VA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrheenen@amsl.com>
Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, nir@apache.org, sanjay.mishra@verizon.com, cdni-ads@ietf.org, cdni-chairs@ietf.org, kevin.j.ma.ietf@gmail.com, francesca.palombini@ericsson.com, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ec23ec05ff1ff85a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/9NT_3IhaPP7VDa_ICT9S_ELunZg>
Subject: Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9388 <draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types-11> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 17:41:15 -0000

Approved.

-MSK, ART AD

On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 10:37 AM Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrheenen@amsl.com>
wrote:

> Hi Murray,
>
> Thanks for reviewing this. We have one addition item for your approval —
> the sentence in the abstract starting with “Furthermore”. Please review and
> let us know if you approve.
>
> This change is best viewed in this diff file:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9388-auth48diff.html.
>
> Thank you,
> RFC Editor/rv
>
>
>
> > On Jun 23, 2023, at 10:31 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 8:22 PM <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> > 1) <!--[rfced] *AD - Should RFC 9241 be added to this document's header
> as being updated by this document?
> >
> > We see the following in the Abstract:
> >
> > "This document also supplements RFC 9241 with relevant ALTO entity
> > domain types."
> >
> > And in the document announcement message (see
> >
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types/writeup/
> ):
> >
> > "The document also updates RFC 9241 with relevant ALTO entity
> > domain types."
> >
> > The current header only indicates RFC 8008 as being updated by this
> document.
> > Please advise.
> >
> > -->
> >
> > This appears to be an extension enacted by an IANA action.  I think that
> means the extension presented here was anticipated by RFC 9241 which
> provided a mechanism for such an extension, which in turn means RFC 9241 is
> not directly updated by this document.
> >
> > So the short answer is "No".  Happy to engage further if someone wants
> to push the question.
> >
> > -MSK, ART AD
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email