IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9262 <draft-ietf-bier-te-arch-13> for your review

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 09 September 2022 20:17 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 699E2C15338E; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 13:17:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kIBuwSA1KzVs; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 13:17:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1033.google.com (mail-pj1-x1033.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1033]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16DC5C15338D; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 13:17:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1033.google.com with SMTP id z9-20020a17090a468900b001ffff693b27so2671317pjf.2; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 13:17:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=qMFvVvFCnQL1FwMpraucGVsq3VrAAd+RwyPA8yRvNXk=; b=np3z1LFB9FxtH608UgQeq79CIIZ5uHbK1BpbjMcb2ytU/bt0GfesaHLoX6aToltFGa 2giisP79gcYIIzjIf5gQkdTVDORmn+ivzKVM0rteEhDuEN0KU+8HU/cGP9DXOmDyc9d0 9xrjCHeOtx/6xvq+mWKeVrsiVjYOLdWrp0DTM27V1oLyXJtVHrJ1uw7HgpDVRNceyOfY OVHafx19b/I4xgmh8tVaDLGjQhugLYD/jwPaWMfdPclvz22pNBHLEo+nwl9mrcx2HEsz 0H3rdbp+RlVOlRIFKXE0LV77olF9l+aGCVzMkIJeA1Wb/rxWJweZlPskyMw2KkInLYtm 11JA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=qMFvVvFCnQL1FwMpraucGVsq3VrAAd+RwyPA8yRvNXk=; b=FqGzjpboKyXIwznEQvY+r8gThibUqh3B14CTWmt70i82pH7QLE5jo4e0z6TXUyuYHY wchmxf4bgTOuXUFzkTl8G8l8FjLd8uFwfQKNhEwEXM4bjb8ucNXmGMLf7lBhYAuqS2ZB CXxs3mLurAJBG/lczENYVzGRQ1ROt7ls//GEDFSWStYLZ9hRoQqI9i5Y5hEVHcdMfxXY Cu3FT7+lW8jrU/VmR/IZAJbEK/WJApS7DkzcZ7WHwp3Ase3cqEk5BI0hoIZnOQ8f+Lbt HxbtULPVBr6xJvSlt4z+C9QmIYXSzGSe01nCopLln2p7Fy6CxGrtNmUFrV+Q3zf2L5Da MCeg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0E+k6GXHb3MekTIWuF78N8d3+i9NVzzRVAC5eIpPJ51v+vcV2v Gntr4CrDzE/e9rDOQXiAFjCZQMxAZa9/hYDFhUM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7/WvQL5+nXNLVCS/F3iJHu9iFo+pIOiuszYqDkyW/K6w/W5Hx7qk6YwFU5yU3dO7xJz8/u6cxj9Q+zb9R5Ef8=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:1205:b0:171:4f8d:22a8 with SMTP id l5-20020a170903120500b001714f8d22a8mr15165054plh.11.1662754664495; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 13:17:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 13:17:43 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <YxuLDRRzbKqYGaUX@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <YwkPrykgkdO4yKJ7@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <2A832207-7E2D-4F8A-8322-26C27928706D@amsl.com> <CAMMESszdfM8Q7s8g5nbWPCSnAbUzJ5mw9jT161TQb87TwdrWtg@mail.gmail.com> <D29DDC18-38B5-4418-B012-004B2DFFE25F@amsl.com> <YxuDoJCXTkN8p+07@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <YxuLDRRzbKqYGaUX@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2022 13:17:43 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMESsz6exMJcBiVWtqyHEwFV=znJ=BGkMsdYHAPiLk=aWoa-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lynne Bartholomew <lbartholomew@amsl.com>, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
Cc: bier-chairs@ietf.org, gengxuesong@huawei.com, RFC System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, tte+ietf@cs.fau.de, gregory@koevoo.tech, bier-ads@ietf.org, menth@uni-tuebingen.de, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/Lr-RSofq3xGEeU7lD5xufBbdhyA>
Subject: Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9262 <draft-ietf-bier-te-arch-13> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2022 20:17:45 -0000

On September 9, 2022 at 2:50:56 PM, Toerless Eckert wrote:


Toerless:

Hi!

> And of course, this is whats suposed to happen when i react quickly ;-),
> i immediately change my mind.
>
> Given how we explicitly define the "underlay" i think we can for BIER-TE
> specifically call the topology the "underlay" topology. But given how
> that would end up being a more strict term than "native" which is more
> loosely, i may want to add some sentence about hybridge underlay/overlay
> topologies...

That works for me.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email