Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment

"Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com> Tue, 04 December 2018 06:29 UTC

Return-Path: <sajassi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D417512D4F1 for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 22:29:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.959
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.959 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VXWMIuVrkJab for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 22:29:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3318E1288EB for <bess@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 22:29:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=15150; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1543904969; x=1545114569; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=NAcdzbxRAXi4ScrLfK7bjpdXNJNLLgfGEhwhtisO2FU=; b=hGQNa3P+ghorYf3aFlDsHO+ei5iPsopWCTRF4tGuqzBf5k7BZnXiLGTI Op4CbWh4JajND6jAhXpF5C7iS0zxZFUMRhjVMxuu8Ca/XAZPFRJPeVgF+ GcarIQShzHHkIkjaRRqq7awC8IhqJ304xNB6OA7TUPTOWe46SYYw2FJXe g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0ADAABqHgZc/5BdJa1jGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBUQQBAQEBAQsBgQ1ILmaBAicKg2+IGYwPgg2Rc4VWFIF?= =?us-ascii?q?mCwEBJYRHAheDNSI0CQ0BAwEBAgEBAm0cDIU8AQEBBCNmAgEIEQMBAisCAgI?= =?us-ascii?q?wHQgBAQQBEoMhAYEdZA+kSYEvhC0BE0A/hG0FjBwXgX+BEScfgkyDHgIDAYE?= =?us-ascii?q?qARIBNgmCZDGCJgKJCgsKMoVHhkuKYwkChwCKPRiBW4URijqJBIRmimECERS?= =?us-ascii?q?BJx84ZHFwFWUBgkGCUIhMhT9BMYlMgR+BHwEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,312,1539648000"; d="scan'208,217";a="208527395"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Dec 2018 06:29:27 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-004.cisco.com (xch-rtp-004.cisco.com [64.101.220.144]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id wB46TR7k027469 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 4 Dec 2018 06:29:27 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-005.cisco.com (64.101.220.145) by XCH-RTP-004.cisco.com (64.101.220.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 01:29:26 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-005.cisco.com ([64.101.220.145]) by XCH-RTP-005.cisco.com ([64.101.220.145]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 01:29:26 -0500
From: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com>
To: "stephane.litkowski@orange.com" <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment
Thread-Index: AdSK9MoVutPXDdgmS+OMrGu2oHHStwAjMPqA
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 06:29:26 +0000
Message-ID: <905966EE-A8D9-4D05-81E8-FE59A9BFE2C8@cisco.com>
References: <17128_1543833795_5C0508C3_17128_38_7_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF924B778825@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
In-Reply-To: <17128_1543833795_5C0508C3_17128_38_7_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF924B778825@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.4.181110
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.67.203]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_905966EEA8D94D0581E8FE59A9BFE2C8ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 64.101.220.144, xch-rtp-004.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-8.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/NCrlp-ugT4D4_g0BLbKggGY_uzA>
Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 06:29:32 -0000


There is one IPR related to this draft that I thought it was disclosed but it wasn’t. I put request  for it to be disclosed ASAP. The term for it is the same as any other Cisco IPR disclosure.
Regarding implementation, this draft has been implemented in Cisco products for quite some time.

Regards,
Ali

From: BESS <bess-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of "stephane.litkowski@orange.com" <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>
Date: Monday, December 3, 2018 at 2:43 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Subject: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment


Hello Working Group,



This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment [1]



This poll runs until *the 17th of December*.



We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors.



There is currently no IPR disclosed.



If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.



We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [2].



    Thank you,

    Stephane & Matthew



    [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment/



    [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw



_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.