IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bier] Proposed mods for architecture draft

Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> Wed, 21 June 2017 17:35 UTC

Return-Path: <gjshep@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04BFA126B7F for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:35:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xaPWtYL2I4Og for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x236.google.com (mail-qk0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABA88120725 for <bier@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x236.google.com with SMTP id 16so2353506qkg.2 for <bier@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=vTFyeIYfPoCQ4K9a3zcPZ6ZJM0GuO7uMHL2v+v9es1o=; b=fGj6kAN1Hyv7JIhpAHMqCRtSZYxMXGdMYjNinDVcCCfX5AyZF1y+pa74gVl3swP8N9 Yx+YdU44L/ythlhLWjmWXfHb21Z/nh9mUUN24Ltr1OhmteCl/JbzUizuPSKl7YBOoz2p kTXKcFsVcsaiIrx2KJ2Atgl15U0Kgl8u5VImDcTVgMo90OBV4/Pe7QI0XIE5BqsSTCor jnMORgc02+CZbVRnVZP9z6tNUr0o3jvyzurOx1XPYe2cR++SpNgxcbRpIEr5tUhHaqKV /3zS8ohaMeu/VZKxw57Q9RIreoDP2PFKSFeZwG/Ys+4Ysu3qOIpwaivji0danS4WM0iQ 3cZA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vTFyeIYfPoCQ4K9a3zcPZ6ZJM0GuO7uMHL2v+v9es1o=; b=nmhMK4UCvzjRewyLDE0ULJUjLsaaGz4PER6V+iPjYnZxvYCpHwT9uLb9v70OgpczgU jfE+mlBBP4ARDw0vHf4L5lq+VliE6FAdrv7AOUDnOjvtrBqfUQl/En9P3l1s2pfZ6BiU FIlyp/Ru6ZF4NxKzPFH9f7+iuwUKMeqgJkW1qUSsmyLRmuKeivqHPjVZxkRhapKGAJKG /9ajVm/AaDEs9/xj6mhChSZ1u8aVJ9Xuntm3Fgs5sYViorXc4zHyhvtUwb8LUxEftm+o eAXoDCfPP1/Vo9uuoieiSqjgUcXLkDdT92A0sgeKiPBImHwzX6oLeERFvJyMr9cknmI3 sUmQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOxR/mvLqOypnGTUJUbX9F+Xz9oFMdrmQGMp1AcdUkRPUQ7TmQ5w XJXv9SBZutnPJ9G+LLONwtFIa4Nsrg==
X-Received: by 10.55.210.193 with SMTP id f184mr43559708qkj.76.1498066540909; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.200.54.101 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: gjshep@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CABFReBr1641fdPB=x6tFsy0ss6E4GD5+hXxOF0OCXSiUxt9DAw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <a97d1160-0fe9-e608-1dc3-8a3dbb44aaa7@juniper.net> <FD5D9B15-8184-4EDA-B532-6B53A44EB687@cisco.com> <d5ee5ae2-e0e8-342c-bbeb-b2acfa471373@juniper.net> <D3DDEC68-6E8B-4BDC-AD37-FD8D6FBD64C0@cisco.com> <CABFReBpF3XSR+5qsjwXAP9uAGKceicxVGZr3HHjg9UqyrwFe8A@mail.gmail.com> <CAG4d1rfUE+HmNcUBRJSn9kG_+8P+pywFWPY5Cq8GoHBo193rBQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABFReBr1641fdPB=x6tFsy0ss6E4GD5+hXxOF0OCXSiUxt9DAw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:35:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CABFReBrHohUF9D45vU22aFcZP3CcSwCW5OM=Abk12t3VWSuoMQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Cc: IJsbrand Wijnands <ice@cisco.com>, "BIER (bier@ietf.org)" <bier@ietf.org>, Eric C Rosen <erosen@juniper.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c04e2c405584a05527bcc16"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/KUt1FhfQSRf0s_GhlXnU7NkN50I>
Subject: Re: [Bier] Proposed mods for architecture draft
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 17:35:44 -0000

Uh, oh.. Looks like that was just done. Thanks!

Greg

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> wrote:

> Good. :)
>
> Which ever author has the cookie, can you please rev and resubmit. We'll
> restart the timer from there.
>
> Thanks,
> Greg
>
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> New revision please.  It's easier to have the document fully updated for
>> various reviews.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alia
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Great! Looks like we have consensus on the issues.
>>>
>>> Alia,
>>>
>>> Do this changes warrant are revision or editor notes?
>>>
>>> Greg
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 9:24 AM, IJsbrand Wijnands <ice@cisco.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Eric, this text works for me!
>>>>
>>>> > It's been pointed out that this prevents a set of BFERs from having a
>>>> shared anycast address as an additional BFR-Prefix.  I am not too bothered
>>>> by this as the use of anycast addresses by multicast receivers doesn't seem
>>>> too crucial, and allowing that would count as a "new feature".
>>>> >
>>>> > Objections?
>>>>
>>>> Nope!
>>>>
>>>> Thx,
>>>>
>>>> Ice.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> BIER mailing list
>>>> BIER@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> BIER mailing list
>>> BIER@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier
>>>
>>>
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email