IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bier] Proposed mods for architecture draft

Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> Wed, 21 June 2017 16:30 UTC

Return-Path: <gjshep@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5477612EB37 for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 09:30:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nJmntDGrQqky for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 09:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22f.google.com (mail-qk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 627AC127909 for <bier@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 09:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id d14so86787160qkb.1 for <bier@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 09:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=xVqel7NYKyoy31VzQgd5n6dlPR0M799iEGxsu6YY1EY=; b=uscC1dMFx5HbIhn05awgKjuzE4t4ziPqzrUzdArrdpVUC1RoGB3eQuYRiRTpYZ0YVX 32E75Uw5hdOQgi9KYjf4xbX98be2PGwe7zcVgrYn1tks7sziMhHUn5QuUGN53QTJqbUf LbsxzDIQvc7Wl7Q9tUd1JwN8vBYPW43kLHAtoD236WFVHk+ODRz2nOh7PiM3VdgrC8+a SoXdbSD8MfBQqijrq1eMicOX0DgdeQwtVDKswO5gBAGn7F7LYxMLZTWpSJApS/46BzCu ULg4StYLlvp5iP9b/YYZpBPEyGy7MAjQk0HQvc6oJGfgqLu4HDqrq+YC6ObdmmvTLD6H RMdg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xVqel7NYKyoy31VzQgd5n6dlPR0M799iEGxsu6YY1EY=; b=nWNV8bQmSjQMGuUwKFiUBZEQf01J0gYHUBUQiG+GlNM6BM+GLw3ny6L87e5t1q9twK YEEVY1wQwA6kKBL2I7Uvjs19+bF34lMCD6+9YRznEtjM9Sc6uh+fzX+HSvR/bLldi6MK YREHlXjFHt7r0ZWNjyHWGPgestK0+eXyNUDBHaIU+xDkwL4U/0juGHMh4NHraGedcxXA hIiaV/wYmWP4L2LO8GzwtqUmSDkMMU27T3tst7U8x/qfwKWH/qJhoH4vERYtzktOPX67 zrGqapwsvMZDhYlyVvPdPlI2o4nY6/1h8O9/WROqVoIpwFwn8Wro8bUg3PMvoVbOMLyf /01Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOxR2lxfRQhW2YF7en8gVgbi4sIWNG4zDLwmiwcI9LvBn2/EXK9u dbW2Q4FTOt045oys5F8FBYIeWWxukw==
X-Received: by 10.55.76.71 with SMTP id z68mr13846672qka.8.1498062615602; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 09:30:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.200.54.101 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 09:30:15 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: gjshep@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <D3DDEC68-6E8B-4BDC-AD37-FD8D6FBD64C0@cisco.com>
References: <a97d1160-0fe9-e608-1dc3-8a3dbb44aaa7@juniper.net> <FD5D9B15-8184-4EDA-B532-6B53A44EB687@cisco.com> <d5ee5ae2-e0e8-342c-bbeb-b2acfa471373@juniper.net> <D3DDEC68-6E8B-4BDC-AD37-FD8D6FBD64C0@cisco.com>
From: Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 09:30:15 -0700
Message-ID: <CABFReBpF3XSR+5qsjwXAP9uAGKceicxVGZr3HHjg9UqyrwFe8A@mail.gmail.com>
To: IJsbrand Wijnands <ice@cisco.com>
Cc: Eric C Rosen <erosen@juniper.net>, "BIER (bier@ietf.org)" <bier@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114a8b920decd905527ae2bd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/ejXdJ6nuK-V5OwPe1sb18CDvFxw>
Subject: Re: [Bier] Proposed mods for architecture draft
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 16:30:18 -0000

Great! Looks like we have consensus on the issues.

Alia,

Do this changes warrant are revision or editor notes?

Greg

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 9:24 AM, IJsbrand Wijnands <ice@cisco.com> wrote:

> Thanks Eric, this text works for me!
>
> > It's been pointed out that this prevents a set of BFERs from having a
> shared anycast address as an additional BFR-Prefix.  I am not too bothered
> by this as the use of anycast addresses by multicast receivers doesn't seem
> too crucial, and allowing that would count as a "new feature".
> >
> > Objections?
>
> Nope!
>
> Thx,
>
> Ice.
> _______________________________________________
> BIER mailing list
> BIER@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email