IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bier] Proposed mods for architecture draft

Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> Wed, 21 June 2017 17:34 UTC

Return-Path: <gjshep@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E55371293D9 for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4L0fbY5de25r for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22c.google.com (mail-qk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB36C128BB6 for <bier@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id 16so2336748qkg.2 for <bier@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=MrGLmvbpP5+UMGB3xm7VvAYm5r7/H1Q6X17SlFgtjd8=; b=gZr1jImjdtvV8qte5LPXW0bOZWQNNClHhzzGZexoch6dFu1oWfM0kFr9pK0j8Fzr5q ZQOTSXzUFdzsHYABrgtwCYnHoielmmI/8oYGuynxT6iFs6advWjwnyOHfv30+p30qmsm de+HMst7BeSFSBHuaJOL1C9q7eyIUR2yKQhqt0LPWUQMWxCi+ZPevAWCK5iJrA2IDaHS J/wInxjDpa9hinpzfSSeB9t5cgq6Lk/AZKOuBIiClFWmEy1wHH0fDH2jPN1iVGfPvBd0 BcDeo5SbX6v++ylLaxr6p/haemQbkRefzRn+7+VzArTP557fcKFHhGxeRlWLbctrKFLW 78Yg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MrGLmvbpP5+UMGB3xm7VvAYm5r7/H1Q6X17SlFgtjd8=; b=n+rieNwUf8mIV+PEijD4ZxMsesrrfr1RLECf9qY5SfWayHYiny631HLrWbLCzahQSt QysEuzgkVZHAyOZLp7WIiAE6MIoZzoaJwvXDfcgMQMt5KJ+lLW0GJx1sgIm3LC0SuJP8 5jaM9jKvYcOnBpzXhZEq7IqXdUPC+2jxt5xNc+k808VuH6KUe1fQd+G+M4azl/j5aZVU AeNg1IzSiDrbzbXzOgVEPCjJ4/QX2iPLt0F88aRAndZkBPvR+NXuHqezVas8DqnO/u6x 8ZcUcrNj8PqGhdCmawbzwD0m5Mu6gvT9RMNye+LcnylT73nR8cQwodXMMilD0mIbntOk DkdA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOyfTIhTS4iacJUTw/F9Wq/yZUyQvZqurazjhQ6INevQwuw0BTwR 2492VjLDmziHuLVMRiEphU7clL9QGw==
X-Received: by 10.55.217.150 with SMTP id q22mr10828049qkl.186.1498066496914; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:34:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.200.54.101 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:34:56 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: gjshep@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CAG4d1rfUE+HmNcUBRJSn9kG_+8P+pywFWPY5Cq8GoHBo193rBQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <a97d1160-0fe9-e608-1dc3-8a3dbb44aaa7@juniper.net> <FD5D9B15-8184-4EDA-B532-6B53A44EB687@cisco.com> <d5ee5ae2-e0e8-342c-bbeb-b2acfa471373@juniper.net> <D3DDEC68-6E8B-4BDC-AD37-FD8D6FBD64C0@cisco.com> <CABFReBpF3XSR+5qsjwXAP9uAGKceicxVGZr3HHjg9UqyrwFe8A@mail.gmail.com> <CAG4d1rfUE+HmNcUBRJSn9kG_+8P+pywFWPY5Cq8GoHBo193rBQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:34:56 -0700
Message-ID: <CABFReBr1641fdPB=x6tFsy0ss6E4GD5+hXxOF0OCXSiUxt9DAw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Cc: IJsbrand Wijnands <ice@cisco.com>, "BIER (bier@ietf.org)" <bier@ietf.org>, Eric C Rosen <erosen@juniper.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113b9c50660e1305527bc972"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/xMVP0-HwW8he2tCaehR-U6-OzU0>
Subject: Re: [Bier] Proposed mods for architecture draft
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 17:35:00 -0000

Good. :)

Which ever author has the cookie, can you please rev and resubmit. We'll
restart the timer from there.

Thanks,
Greg

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> wrote:

> New revision please.  It's easier to have the document fully updated for
> various reviews.
>
> Thanks,
> Alia
>
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Great! Looks like we have consensus on the issues.
>>
>> Alia,
>>
>> Do this changes warrant are revision or editor notes?
>>
>> Greg
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 9:24 AM, IJsbrand Wijnands <ice@cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Eric, this text works for me!
>>>
>>> > It's been pointed out that this prevents a set of BFERs from having a
>>> shared anycast address as an additional BFR-Prefix.  I am not too bothered
>>> by this as the use of anycast addresses by multicast receivers doesn't seem
>>> too crucial, and allowing that would count as a "new feature".
>>> >
>>> > Objections?
>>>
>>> Nope!
>>>
>>> Thx,
>>>
>>> Ice.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> BIER mailing list
>>> BIER@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> BIER mailing list
>> BIER@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier
>>
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email