IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bier] Proposed mods for architecture draft

Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> Wed, 21 June 2017 17:12 UTC

Return-Path: <tonysietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817E2129422 for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zl5wRLPChJoL for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:12:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x232.google.com (mail-wr0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97C29127876 for <bier@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:12:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x232.google.com with SMTP id c11so87998338wrc.3 for <bier@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:12:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=M/iOEr6/dqj9/EfzKpmb+hrQIUhRNMYL4QXawGLMJtY=; b=t83Tf6sqvOuLzTw5C8p5GJvljcu46lEZww8GHqcCRnXtszDarRjgEXqrviCwtGWFF4 MwVPqHdIf2j7Avhz6oaDQT+X8gWx1SytCxThAh4DCs3CCQjHu+hDvSxPYUYjdlKfIhU1 w1iFSR/uKGf+++jTWbCFEl0Ys5Ox8OtbDd9v2itwNxV6CZieZDeSb7tOnZ13MBQpA+5B miwCrdI971fO6clUsBMxyqkDLZBUbqXYmzCocjoJYtGRQcOoP2vu4XLAGKyk7Nh18jFd XV/oFCp3tph0JSUB11seDMyAzP1SEBs67YUP3HbeGYYaSpOOefIiviVNwLQa6wY/dcET FKDg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=M/iOEr6/dqj9/EfzKpmb+hrQIUhRNMYL4QXawGLMJtY=; b=tg0qaaSJfJrHsUywq8zdDI2vrKHblR3BNcyg9tf7z9aJ9e/LGtLTMqm1bh+9q4iqHK GcgDr4lDxi/NjViNjnG715DJkhSITNEVQP4EoJV/KppeY0/Rpckjih7HkWMGf4S9YKnz Az4jB/fPbXHDzxr9ukHV9W8EXOiWZIlCvsTjcW0tM+G1RTNDFne+5gFYAgp/3LAbldui jYFZDX+ZUjnLHZQY+Cz4NnlNJdMb+zRF8SAsIlfEV5r7fQgFoKmF0k4Sdwm8r9uU9O0/ JWIc0L9Y1A3Xzt0NiFThw+wOnylrK4rtvr3TikAQaLXTnM3qZGkajaHuKsdEGiH385wq CrjQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOyItRFH+AyTt8X0XWXhnk3rCkJsm7JDmEHU0Yo+9XCopGqSxmC1 iEStXkJKDxTwAGMk0JhLcOuv6YDHTA==
X-Received: by 10.80.167.65 with SMTP id h59mr26317595edc.0.1498065155026; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:12:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.80.183.155 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABFReBpF3XSR+5qsjwXAP9uAGKceicxVGZr3HHjg9UqyrwFe8A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <a97d1160-0fe9-e608-1dc3-8a3dbb44aaa7@juniper.net> <FD5D9B15-8184-4EDA-B532-6B53A44EB687@cisco.com> <d5ee5ae2-e0e8-342c-bbeb-b2acfa471373@juniper.net> <D3DDEC68-6E8B-4BDC-AD37-FD8D6FBD64C0@cisco.com> <CABFReBpF3XSR+5qsjwXAP9uAGKceicxVGZr3HHjg9UqyrwFe8A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:11:54 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+wi2hORTRo3TgNLnoUAdCL0zj7_vCDi0B7QEZtqk0_N7Zkkrw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>
Cc: IJsbrand Wijnands <ice@cisco.com>, "BIER (bier@ietf.org)" <bier@ietf.org>, Eric C Rosen <erosen@juniper.net>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="94eb2c195af26a8da305527b79be"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/zkxC-XJAAl5Zdcy2KmzVtNEbAxA>
Subject: Re: [Bier] Proposed mods for architecture draft
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 17:12:44 -0000

Looks good to me now, Eric.  I do vote for keeping the *"v4 XOR v6 BFR
prefix for all BFRs in a subdomain"* relationship as KISS

Attached what I see we are talking about here now given the language is
being stretched here quite a bit ...

--- tony

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> wrote:

> Great! Looks like we have consensus on the issues.
>
> Alia,
>
> Do this changes warrant are revision or editor notes?
>
> Greg
>
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 9:24 AM, IJsbrand Wijnands <ice@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Eric, this text works for me!
>>
>> > It's been pointed out that this prevents a set of BFERs from having a
>> shared anycast address as an additional BFR-Prefix.  I am not too bothered
>> by this as the use of anycast addresses by multicast receivers doesn't seem
>> too crucial, and allowing that would count as a "new feature".
>> >
>> > Objections?
>>
>> Nope!
>>
>> Thx,
>>
>> Ice.
>> _______________________________________________
>> BIER mailing list
>> BIER@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BIER mailing list
> BIER@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier
>
>


-- 
*We’ve heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce
the complete works of Shakespeare; now, thanks to the Internet, we know
that is not true.*
—Robert Wilensky

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email