IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bier] Proposed mods for architecture draft

Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Wed, 21 June 2017 17:26 UTC

Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FEEE1293D9 for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:26:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E07HSqXC2Kk8 for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:26:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x236.google.com (mail-wr0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEC14128656 for <bier@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x236.google.com with SMTP id l5so787944wre.2 for <bier@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Whfv8fK56GE/zsEaWMYxJRVER6n/wqQcfzrBmN5C5kY=; b=UIc9XrifsarBRMw3lGGH5H5kq0OnWyVyOlASjJ/3HAyVE4Q4lxjGL9jORMuVt3ZAeZ A2KqipokzPH5HA8gxfkBPuMrWwUze+OYFsFeuVb2opGrOoRdP+A7Hu1gqpMNR/yLybri PoMe+sOiJk+VYZZyYqJb0X/KA51F2C0MY0haEq+i4I/aQ5NoZ3Vbsyv0RF54uzekv335 /ZBUqXaDlbSa0ipDGZ2M+58/f96OSiDd05Tk3KrJLbPnyLXEP7+WSBsxMGQlS/tIhQw3 bXDtZhpOnkzLO+vaMl9fJ+OGa0JyuKO/3asXF6m8c60VvNEhUPc7uET8zPvT9PsVXae3 1CXA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Whfv8fK56GE/zsEaWMYxJRVER6n/wqQcfzrBmN5C5kY=; b=L5EZ4KxbWBVmR+RdEEE4KohEi5AMQG55uD9japPjV9a13L9Fih9ojAOA1n36FduCdl GIQzfNyixmA03TUHgRFp7XYi1fcLVZR/efPbmTx8hjKW8MeneLrRZ1+tDz9819L2xMeL gN9Cu7vfeJTZ2CR4pC0YY9bHOm2ohZXAoqWNE1o6mswcDemCIzHn32A3fe28SrFMmYOr 7JpdZN7P6lqDY8IQ9Otaf2GanAhpzyxvyKZyuGT28F9SeS6hSg6bFSCeVAlsjq1BjPiq ODlBISY/hK+fCfPI29d+Eg2NvLbetOhFzaUV1DxvJZXzdfWMUZRx3ZNMeOT366R04fry 5nvQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOxTeY/VFr7d1+PycZCVnslyd+DCs/A23kJ5Biq32cAQ1vIJO/aH OPjlr/qraNDPqw82LjaeCz1kMeXqNw==
X-Received: by 10.28.208.207 with SMTP id h198mr7463052wmg.40.1498065976375; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.130.179 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABFReBpF3XSR+5qsjwXAP9uAGKceicxVGZr3HHjg9UqyrwFe8A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <a97d1160-0fe9-e608-1dc3-8a3dbb44aaa7@juniper.net> <FD5D9B15-8184-4EDA-B532-6B53A44EB687@cisco.com> <d5ee5ae2-e0e8-342c-bbeb-b2acfa471373@juniper.net> <D3DDEC68-6E8B-4BDC-AD37-FD8D6FBD64C0@cisco.com> <CABFReBpF3XSR+5qsjwXAP9uAGKceicxVGZr3HHjg9UqyrwFe8A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 13:26:15 -0400
Message-ID: <CAG4d1rfUE+HmNcUBRJSn9kG_+8P+pywFWPY5Cq8GoHBo193rBQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>
Cc: IJsbrand Wijnands <ice@cisco.com>, "BIER (bier@ietf.org)" <bier@ietf.org>, Eric C Rosen <erosen@juniper.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c1931985f431505527baa3e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/j-Fo_hJiD82mt_ZuNT03gghmALc>
Subject: Re: [Bier] Proposed mods for architecture draft
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 17:26:20 -0000

New revision please.  It's easier to have the document fully updated for
various reviews.

Thanks,
Alia

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> wrote:

> Great! Looks like we have consensus on the issues.
>
> Alia,
>
> Do this changes warrant are revision or editor notes?
>
> Greg
>
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 9:24 AM, IJsbrand Wijnands <ice@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Eric, this text works for me!
>>
>> > It's been pointed out that this prevents a set of BFERs from having a
>> shared anycast address as an additional BFR-Prefix.  I am not too bothered
>> by this as the use of anycast addresses by multicast receivers doesn't seem
>> too crucial, and allowing that would count as a "new feature".
>> >
>> > Objections?
>>
>> Nope!
>>
>> Thx,
>>
>> Ice.
>> _______________________________________________
>> BIER mailing list
>> BIER@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BIER mailing list
> BIER@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email