IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bimi] (non)desire for bimi

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Sat, 16 February 2019 16:12 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: bimi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bimi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3606D1275F3 for <bimi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 08:12:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dcrocker.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OPs0-vJ2-YYM for <bimi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 08:12:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11F89130E73 for <bimi@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 08:12:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.168] (108-226-162-63.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [108.226.162.63]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id x1GGDMsw024356 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 16 Feb 2019 08:13:22 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dcrocker.net; s=default; t=1550333602; bh=vyQ08f5BVs53XS46NIA9M84IkcuiuLKJEl6wMP4VYxY=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:Reply-To:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=cUZQNuEL9TZrJNzsQtrTMzn89RouoBws2kpaV6fwbYiqtqGYc+PuZMdEjDJoQqfne Tzerq2R9Ow0GEGjYxeXPKiArCmYmNLSHBNhXsEKd6CSe+IjQSsXDRk5WrJ+vCIn1c1 rZTs753gQ/pLxZrBPRiXXqTLv2eGuR5mIyafIv7Y=
To: Marcel Becker <marcel.becker=40verizonmedia.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <aa919aeb-caa1-6494-259d-a553b238c268@cs.tcd.ie> <3d9231e9-6936-cc02-000e-a4d7df919bb4@andreasschulze.de> <CAAYvrBvGediUY1W9PZ+JuS585Mk8wxLpFq7TZELSOF-NSp5CyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: bimi@ietf.org
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <5c7a10e3-47a0-e84a-d78a-dea5c44fb2ae@dcrocker.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2019 08:11:51 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAAYvrBvGediUY1W9PZ+JuS585Mk8wxLpFq7TZELSOF-NSp5CyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bimi/TksY2UdvwpdAKpXfyAzATZ7MzJc>
Subject: Re: [Bimi] (non)desire for bimi
X-BeenThere: bimi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Brand Indicators for Message Identification <bimi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bimi>, <mailto:bimi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bimi/>
List-Post: <mailto:bimi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bimi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bimi>, <mailto:bimi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2019 16:12:05 -0000

On 2/16/2019 8:07 AM, Marcel Becker wrote:
>> All, what BIMI could do, is to teach
>> "Hey User, this message from $BRAND is only valid if you also see $BRAND's logo"
>>
> And that would be bad thing?


Except, of course, that it will not have that effect on users, because 
there is extensive experience demonstrating that users mostly do not 
learn or use such signals.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email