IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cacao] [EXT] RE: Charter

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 18 June 2019 13:41 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cacao@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cacao@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A431F120033 for <cacao@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 06:41:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bPk-M6F58Wuu for <cacao@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 06:41:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AB5E12002E for <cacao@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 06:41:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [134.102.28.146] (unknown [134.102.28.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45Sq406FF7zylM; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 15:41:20 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR16MB30137AC9C00633E80C7C8D65EDEA0@BYAPR16MB3013.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 15:41:20 +0200
Cc: "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>, "cacao@ietf.org" <cacao@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 582558079.056484-d8d1d79797c0e4af655bb3ffe5a994c8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <779CCF55-FABB-4BA1-9D84-1D9761A32944@tzi.org>
References: <BYAPR16MB30133C3DAF3CF2060CE4B565EDEA0@BYAPR16MB3013.namprd16.prod.outlook.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302EAA890F@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <BYAPR16MB30137AC9C00633E80C7C8D65EDEA0@BYAPR16MB3013.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
To: Bret Jordan <Bret_Jordan=40symantec.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cacao/FM65-fMEip31QbjraDZBf8ftEa8>
Subject: Re: [Cacao] [EXT] RE: Charter
X-BeenThere: cacao@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Collaborative Automated Course of Action Operations <cacao.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cacao>, <mailto:cacao-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cacao/>
List-Post: <mailto:cacao@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cacao-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cacao>, <mailto:cacao-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 13:41:26 -0000

On Jun 18, 2019, at 14:24, Bret Jordan <Bret_Jordan=40symantec.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Using Github will prevent people from helping, or will limit people to only those that understand how to use Github and have access to Github.  Resolving comments and suggestions via Github is significantly harder than Google Docs.

My comment here is kind of off-topic, but…
The statement you are making here is that one group of contributors (those that can stand collaborating on a document with the limited means Google Docs) is more important than another group of contributors (those that are used to software development workflows).  While that may very well be, I think it is important to make decisions like this explicitly.
(I personally believe that this effort could benefit from strong participation by people who write code.)

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email