Re: [Cacao] [EXT] Re: [EXT] RE: Charter

[Amelia Andersdotter <[e-mail]>]

On 2019-06-18 16:05, Bret Jordan wrote:
>
> Carsten,
>
>
> I appreciate your comments. However, from our experience, with a
> large group of people that are in both camps, editing specs in Google
> docs proves to be the easiest solution for all. So it is not about
> preferring one group over another.  It is about what proves to be the
> easiest and fastest to enable as many people as possible to get work
> done quickly and efficiently. 
>
>
How about making it temporarily available on some form of etherpad? They
are normally accessible to everyone and rely only on browser functions.


best regards,

amelia


> Bret
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 18, 2019 7:41:20 AM
> *To:* Bret Jordan
> *Cc:* [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> *Subject:* [EXT] Re: [Cacao] [EXT] RE: Charter
>  
> On Jun 18, 2019, at 14:24, Bret Jordan
> <Bret_Jordan=[e-mail]> wrote:
> >
> > Using Github will prevent people from helping, or will limit people
> to only those that understand how to use Github and have access to
> Github.  Resolving comments and suggestions via Github is
> significantly harder than Google Docs.
>
> My comment here is kind of off-topic, but…
> The statement you are making here is that one group of contributors
> (those that can stand collaborating on a document with the limited
> means Google Docs) is more important than another group of
> contributors (those that are used to software development workflows). 
> While that may very well be, I think it is important to make decisions
> like this explicitly.
> (I personally believe that this effort could benefit from strong
> participation by people who write code.)
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>
>

-- 
Amelia Andersdotter
Technical Consultant, Digital Programme
Chair, RCM TIG, IEEE 802.11

ARTICLE19
www.article19.org

PGP: 3D5D B6CA B852 B988 055A 6A6F FEF1 C294 B4E8 0B55