Re: [Cacao] [EXT] Re: [EXT] RE: Charter

Amelia,

That is an option.  Just so you know, Google Docs does not require anything other than a web browser.  If you go this url, just like an ether pad, you will see the document and suggestions and comments. 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fTN0uilpBVx6CwaGxj8SBKG4PqG7DceInU9RgLz9pRo/edit#heading=h.wh8etuclav2g <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fTN0uilpBVx6CwaGxj8SBKG4PqG7DceInU9RgLz9pRo/edit#heading=h.wh8etuclav2g>

Thanks,
Bret
PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447  F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050
"Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg."

> On Jun 18, 2019, at 4:26 PM, Amelia Andersdotter <amelia@article19.org> wrote:
> 
> On 2019-06-18 16:05, Bret Jordan wrote:
>> 
>> Carsten,
>> 
>> 
>> I appreciate your comments. However, from our experience, with a
>> large group of people that are in both camps, editing specs in Google
>> docs proves to be the easiest solution for all. So it is not about
>> preferring one group over another.  It is about what proves to be the
>> easiest and fastest to enable as many people as possible to get work
>> done quickly and efficiently. 
>> 
>> 
> How about making it temporarily available on some form of etherpad? They
> are normally accessible to everyone and rely only on browser functions.
> 
> 
> best regards,
> 
> amelia
> 
> 
>> Bret
>> 
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 18, 2019 7:41:20 AM
>> *To:* Bret Jordan
>> *Cc:* mohamed.boucadair@orange.com; cacao@ietf.org
>> *Subject:* [EXT] Re: [Cacao] [EXT] RE: Charter
>>  
>> On Jun 18, 2019, at 14:24, Bret Jordan
>> <Bret_Jordan=40symantec.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Using Github will prevent people from helping, or will limit people
>> to only those that understand how to use Github and have access to
>> Github.  Resolving comments and suggestions via Github is
>> significantly harder than Google Docs.
>> 
>> My comment here is kind of off-topic, but…
>> The statement you are making here is that one group of contributors
>> (those that can stand collaborating on a document with the limited
>> means Google Docs) is more important than another group of
>> contributors (those that are used to software development workflows). 
>> While that may very well be, I think it is important to make decisions
>> like this explicitly.
>> (I personally believe that this effort could benefit from strong
>> participation by people who write code.)
>> 
>> Grüße, Carsten
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Amelia Andersdotter
> Technical Consultant, Digital Programme
> Chair, RCM TIG, IEEE 802.11
> 
> ARTICLE19
> www.article19.org
> 
> PGP: 3D5D B6CA B852 B988 055A 6A6F FEF1 C294 B4E8 0B55
> 
> -- 
> Cacao mailing list
> Cacao@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cacao