Re: [CCAMP] TR: New Version Notification for draft-peloso-ccamp-wson-ospf-oeo-03.txt

Greg Bernstein <gregb@grotto-networking.com> Mon, 13 June 2011 18:19 UTC

Return-Path: <gregb@grotto-networking.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07DC411E816C for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25tYl7sqTdT3 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:19:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail16c40.carrierzone.com (mail16c40.carrierzone.com [209.235.156.156]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45D3A11E816A for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authenticated-User: gregb.grotto-networking.com
Received: from [192.168.0.125] (c-67-170-243-110.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.170.243.110]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail16c40.carrierzone.com (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p5DIJpp7012083 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:19:53 +0000
Message-ID: <4DF654C6.3070304@grotto-networking.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:19:50 -0700
From: Greg Bernstein <gregb@grotto-networking.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ccamp@ietf.org
References: <CCBFBB7025DF984494DEC3285C058152129673243E@FRMRSSXCHMBSA1.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <CCBFBB7025DF984494DEC3285C058152129673243E@FRMRSSXCHMBSA1.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010101000001000302070108"
X-CSC: 0
X-CHA: v=1.1 cv=LvQVMIZUS58yL9hWRjeuHLcSaeQ50qeHkxDPFdYYCW8= c=1 sm=1 a=9TeGTiT7SGcA:10 a=DdmVC2UI6o4A:10 a=xOaALFOtT5cA:10 a=B4uWGr+4DaAYpgidvygSiQ==:17 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=8FEMaWjG0B9vzkPhg80A:9 a=JKdoK75bPzGdXQZW1nAA:7 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=EgY3od2ZU2QA:10 a=h-I_03WOSDMA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=z3uV_y52FQzpZCK8:21 a=lNru0fGZ7zC3lnmk:21 a=gxZvrgisAAAA:8 a=OUJNPk0uTuaRokiZFw8A:9 a=gaBEU0KyblMdhwplwM4A:7 a=B4uWGr+4DaAYpgidvygSiQ==:117
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] TR: New Version Notification for draft-peloso-ccamp-wson-ospf-oeo-03.txt
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:19:56 -0000

Hi Pierre and draft authors, can you provide:
(1) Diagrams of the example switches particularly with respect to the 
structure of the resource pools/blocks.
(2) Explanation of why so many different types (not number) of 
regenerators in an optical node. You site 5 different types for a small 
node and 10 for a large node. Can you point to a product family?  I 
would think 0-1 types of regenerators for a small node and at maybe 2 
for a large node or nodes that deal with long haul and metro types 
modulations.
(3) Can you provide the example encodings such as done in the appendix 
of the encoding document so we can understand where the expansion is 
taking place.

It seems that the size expansions is directly related to the number of 
regenerator types, but hard to tell from this document.  Are there any 
other WSON interested parties that have a need for so many regenerator 
types?

Cheers

Greg B.

On 6/10/2011 7:19 AM, PELOSO, PIERRE (PIERRE) wrote:
> Hi Ccampers,
>
> During Prague meeting I was asked to provide a draft detailing the solution we were presenting then concerning OSPF-TE extensions for Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (see point 10 of ccamp minutes).
> Julien, Giovanni, Cyril and I have tackled this work of providing a complete description of the solution with commonalities and deltas from the existing solution held in the following drafts:
>    - draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-info-11
>    - draft-ietf-ccamp-general-constraint-encode-04
>    - draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-general-constraints-ospf-te-00
>    - draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-11
>    - draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signal-compatibility-ospf-04
>
> Feedback from the working group is welcome.
>
> To trigger this feedback, this draft holds inside section 5 a numerical study on the amount of static and dynamic information to be flooded.
> This study was conducted on various typical WSON nodes and compares the size of the LSAs between the two solutions.
>
> Regards,
>
> - Pierre
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp


-- 
===================================================
Dr Greg Bernstein, Grotto Networking (510) 573-2237