Re: [CCAMP] Input on publication track of WSON solutions documents

"Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)" <giomarti@cisco.com> Mon, 08 October 2012 12:57 UTC

Return-Path: <giomarti@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F4F221F859E for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 05:57:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7eiHoyyXo4uy for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 05:57:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F83D21F858E for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 05:57:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2314; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1349701060; x=1350910660; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=4PnSOslZBXDQx92f/aLNIDiH/RUfoCrXFZmn+p0VFc4=; b=Z+/0K2F3zEf4Knh6lNtPu/O3bLLlYimq3ZzQC0Ql43T8J3CPwgP1aFWY 7XkWW9d1f4oBHQuyQD0SXLvZUwmbauRDfI1dHkfcxKNva4xW1Y9HeuDsH ygBMKwe6f5QpSKuCcSWKa8r4MQ/idmgywfb5sYmdeWwYuGsjqb5xsxfvv Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EADPNclCtJXHB/2dsb2JhbABFvymBCIIgAQEBAwEBAQEPASc0CwULAgEIDhQUECcLJQIEDgUIEweHXQYLmVWfNQSLTxqFFmADpDCBaYJtgWM0
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,554,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="129352920"
Received: from rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com ([173.37.113.193]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Oct 2012 12:57:40 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com [173.36.12.85]) by rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q98CvWK6008902 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 8 Oct 2012 12:57:33 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.51]) by xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com ([173.36.12.85]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 07:57:32 -0500
From: "Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)" <giomarti@cisco.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Input on publication track of WSON solutions documents
Thread-Index: AQHNoKqeqfZe2GoalECei7W5Gj2AD5evu28A
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 12:57:32 +0000
Message-ID: <0D7F95913F470A4B83AB5F5833A4390D0FB7D3@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com>
References: <506AFA9B.2000508@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <506AFA9B.2000508@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [144.254.172.186]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19252.004
x-tm-as-result: No--44.207600-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <D1ED866B448C434B8B3A580A1D8896CE@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Input on publication track of WSON solutions documents
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 12:57:41 -0000

support option a.

cheers
G


On Oct 2, 2012, at 16:30 , Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:

> CCAMP,
> 
> The WG has several WSON-related drafts including:
>   1. draft-ietf-ccamp-general-constraint-encode
>   2. draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-general-constraints-ospf-te
>   3. draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode
>   4. draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signal-compatibility-ospf 	
>   5. draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling
> 
> These drafts are currently identified as being on the Standards
> Track.  The WG typically requests Standards Track publication of
> documents that fill/fix a clear protocol function and/or have
> strong WG support. Given the scope of this work as well as the
> time the drafts have been active in the WG, we'd like to solicit
> the WG's input on the publication track to be requested.
> 
> Once the WG reaches consensus on these drafts (as indicated by a
> *future* WG last call), Standards Track publication can be
> requested or these drafts could also be published via a
> non-Standards Track, see section 4.2 of RFC2026 for all options.
> 
> Please let us know (preferably by responding on the WG list) if you:
> 
> a. Support targeting all of these documents for Standards Track
>   publication?
>  [yes/no]
> 
> b. If no, support targeting some of these documents for Standards
>   Track publication?
>  [1, yes/no
>   2, yes/no
>   3, yes/no
>   4, yes/no
>   5, yes/no]
> 
> c. If no to any of the above, which status do you think appropriate?
>  [Experimental or Informational]
> 
> d. Finally, we are most interested in hearing from anyone who has,
>   or is planning an implementation based on the WG drafts.  We
>   understand that some may not want this information published,
>   so please let any of the chairs and/or ADs know (Lou,
>   Deborah, Adrian or Stewart), and they will publish the
>   information without any personal or company identification.
> 
> Keep in mind that this mail is *not* starting a WG last call on
> any of the documents identified above.  We'd like input on
> intended publication status prior to any last call discussion.
> 
> Lou and Deborah
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp