IETF Logo Mail Archive

Alignment of OIF routing requirements with CCAMP ASON routing requirements [Was : Proposed response to OIF on OSPF ENNI]

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 26 July 2006 13:11 UTC

Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G5jAk-0004d7-RJ for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:11:34 -0400
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G5jAj-0000BN-Bx for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:11:34 -0400
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1G5j2m-000MXt-9g for ccamp-data@psg.com; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:03:20 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=ham version=3.1.1
Received: from [80.68.34.49] (helo=mail2.noc.data.net.uk) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <adrian@olddog.co.uk>) id 1G5j2l-000MXW-0F for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:03:19 +0000
Received: from 57-99.dsl.data.net.uk ([80.68.57.99] helo=cortex.aria-networks.com) by mail2.noc.data.net.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1G5j2h-0005Ak-00 for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:03:15 +0100
Received: from your029b8cecfe ([217.158.132.199] RDNS failed) by cortex.aria-networks.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:03:16 +0100
Message-ID: <015a01c6b0b3$d9d24af0$0a23fea9@your029b8cecfe>
Reply-To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "Sadler, Jonathan B." <Jonathan.Sadler@tellabs.com>
Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
References: <A1A52203CA93634BA1748887B9993AEA02FC5B46@USNVEX1.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net>
Subject: Alignment of OIF routing requirements with CCAMP ASON routing requirements [Was : Proposed response to OIF on OSPF ENNI]
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:58:45 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jul 2006 13:03:17.0396 (UTC) FILETIME=[DCA34540:01C6B0B3]
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9182cfff02fae4f1b6e9349e01d62f32

Jon,

Deborah asked your opinion on whether CCAMP's ASON requirements document and 
evaluation document meet the needs of OIF. You say you are unable to make 
this personal evaluation. That is surprising. One would expect that you 
would have some sort of clue as:
- a named contributer and member of the design team for RFC4258
- an author of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ason-routing-eval
- an active participant in CCAMP where these two documents were last called
- a named contributer to "Draft OIF Specification for E-NNI Routing using 
OSPF (Restructured)"
- the editor of G.7715.

Lyndon has stated that he believes there is good alignment and that the 
objective is alignment.

Will you state your opinion?

Thanks,
Adrian

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status