IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cfrg] AES-SIV versus AES-GCM for Encrypted Key Data

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Tue, 17 May 2016 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C55612DA54 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 May 2016 09:02:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.727
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.727 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O4R9uy6vRTao for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 May 2016 09:02:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A49412D6EA for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 17 May 2016 09:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id F14E4BE33; Tue, 17 May 2016 17:02:04 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ugYNmMClmZ6c; Tue, 17 May 2016 17:02:02 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.87.48.100] (95-45-153-252-dynamic.agg2.phb.bdt-fng.eircom.net [95.45.153.252]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C0AEDBE2F; Tue, 17 May 2016 17:01:52 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1463500913; bh=eomNciKgGKg6Bw3GtTl1pxKVU5BWHz3vA04Dy2w4Xuc=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=HcazLGpD7yxbdqYSI1RAYVaddn1/RxaxqgWztUOvXl+plYwlQPzU7zDl/ZVJC/DuJ 3xRk9VrF/1Yypl6FnRlY1aGjpJhFefBYatVsunIH4eNQ5TA0zBleeUAI4lh0NSF7WO 3ncwoUuuEw5/T4Wp7ad3IPAL47SdmX7Lh4qcfiqc=
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
References: <D35F6F11.93C3E%paul@marvell.com> <297966AA-C7E0-4C3B-BA56-8D61D7824D66@vigilsec.com> <D35F843A.93C91%paul@marvell.com> <89A44D23-D8A2-4A2F-A94E-6A362FC195C7@vigilsec.com> <573B24ED.70708@cs.tcd.ie> <00A212BA-E86D-4DF5-8987-FA1DF046B634@vigilsec.com> <573B34DC.9080103@cs.tcd.ie> <FA8C1D26-AF94-427E-942F-DA0D8A5C73A3@vigilsec.com>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <573B4070.4050405@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 17:01:52 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <FA8C1D26-AF94-427E-942F-DA0D8A5C73A3@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms060404040400010608020400"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/K0AGLkFXadl9CcWh_-GIC7U_FfQ>
Resent-From: alias-bounces@ietf.org
Resent-To: <>
Cc: IRTF CFRG <cfrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] AES-SIV versus AES-GCM for Encrypted Key Data
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 16:02:16 -0000


On 17/05/16 16:19, Russ Housley wrote:
> My understanding is that the task group rejected the proposed changes yesterday.


Ah thanks. We're done here so I guess.

Cheers,
S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email