IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CGA-EXT] [Fwd: Next steps on CSI after IETF71]

marcelo bagnulo <marcelo@it.uc3m.es> Mon, 24 March 2008 09:10 UTC

Return-Path: <cga-ext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-cga-ext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-cga-ext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0EB128C23E; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 02:10:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.797
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.797 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.360, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fN4QZd2y9Oze; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 02:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 319B228C239; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 02:09:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: cga-ext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cga-ext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC23028C1D7 for <cga-ext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 02:09:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uUBBiPqChCZI for <cga-ext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 02:09:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp01.uc3m.es (smtp01.uc3m.es [163.117.176.131]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11AD028C239 for <cga-ext@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 02:09:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dummyhost8.it.uc3m.es (dummyhost7.it.uc3m.es [163.117.139.53])by smtp01.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id C51B54E3DE2; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:07:30 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <47E76F52.10201@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:07:30 +0100
From: marcelo bagnulo <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
References: <47E6D7AF.9010904@it.uc3m.es> <47E6FB25.5020009@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <47E6FB25.5020009@ericsson.com>
X-imss-version: 2.050
X-imss-result: Passed
X-imss-scanInfo: M:B L:E SM:2
X-imss-tmaseResult: TT:1 TS:-24.8372 TC:1F TRN:45 TV:5.0.1023(15806.003)
X-imss-scores: Clean:100.00000 C:0 M:0 S:0 R:0
X-imss-settings: Baseline:1 C:1 M:1 S:1 R:1 (0.0000 0.0000)
Cc: cga-ext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [CGA-EXT] [Fwd: Next steps on CSI after IETF71]
X-BeenThere: cga-ext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: CGA and SeND Extensions <cga-ext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext>, <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/cga-ext>
List-Post: <mailto:cga-ext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext>, <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: cga-ext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: cga-ext-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Suresh,

The next steps on the proxy send solution is to finnish the pb statement 
and we can also in parallel evaluate different solutions. However at 
this point, there are several solutions (at least two were presented in 
the meeting) so it is not clear to us what is what the WG wants to do 
with this.
So, the position at this point is to keep the discussion and see how it 
evolves, makes sense?

regards, marcelo


Suresh Krishnan escribió:
> Hi Marcelo and Gabriel,
>   What about draft-krishnan-cgaext-proxy-send?
>
> Thanks
> Suresh
>
> marcelo bagnulo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> these are the next steps for the items discussed in the meeting.
>> let us know if you have comments.
>>
>> Regards, Gabriel and marcelo
>>
>> Proxy SND Problem Statement
>> draft-daley-send-spnd-prob-02
>>
>> One more version of the draft addressing comments in the meeting and 
>> then we will ask for adoption
>> The new version should address Dave Thaler comments about the 
>> different scenarios, anycast case to be studied in more depth, 
>> multicast is out of scope, may be kept just to mention what is not 
>> covered by the solutions space
>>
>> Certificate profiles and Management
>> Initial work being done, if more people is interested, join the team
>>
>> DHCPv6 Delegation of Certificates Option
>> draft-popoviciu-dhc-certificate-opt-01.txt
>> C. Popoviciu, R. Droms, E. Levy-Abegnoli - 15 min
>>
>> WG to read the draft and comment
>>
>> Hash Threat Analysis for SeND and Send Crypto Agility
>> A. Kukec, S. Jiang, S. Krishnan - 20 min
>> Authors to produce a draft including a proposal n how to encode hash 
>> agility. If the proposal is adopted, this will be part of RFC3971 update
>>
>>
>> 8. Update for RFC3971: support in SEND for non-CGA addresses
>> E. Levy-Abegnoli
>>
>> Not clear how to deal with this, more disucssion is needed.
>> What is clear is that something is needed in this space, since the 
>> the original rfc3971 is incomplete in this area
>>
>> 9. Public key algortihm agility in SeND
>> S. Shuo
>> We expect two things: a draft on how to support ECC in SeND and CGAs, 
>> and a proposal on how to support PK agility in SeND and CGAs to be 
>> uncluded in the rfc3971/2 update
>> People interested in working on this should contact the chairs
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CGA-EXT mailing list
>> CGA-EXT@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext
>
>

_______________________________________________
CGA-EXT mailing list
CGA-EXT@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email