[CGA-EXT] [Fwd: Next steps on CSI after IETF71]
marcelo bagnulo <marcelo@it.uc3m.es> Sun, 23 March 2008 22:22 UTC
Return-Path: <cga-ext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-cga-ext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-cga-ext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFE123A67B1; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.464
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.464 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.027, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yYNwCcC-bqWd; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:22:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E43E33A68C3; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:22:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: cga-ext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cga-ext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C213A67B1 for <cga-ext@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:22:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B2Fhjh8RV7OR for <cga-ext@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:22:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp01.uc3m.es (smtp01.uc3m.es [163.117.176.131]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1260A3A6A10 for <cga-ext@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:22:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from macbook-de-marcelo-bagnulo.local (2.45.217.87.dynamic.jazztel.es [87.217.45.2])by smtp01.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F724E2D04for <cga-ext@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:20:31 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <47E6D7AF.9010904@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:20:31 +0100
From: marcelo bagnulo <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cga-ext@ietf.org
X-imss-version: 2.050
X-imss-result: Passed
X-imss-scanInfo: M:B L:E SM:2
X-imss-tmaseResult: TT:1 TS:-12.0497 TC:1F TRN:31 TV:5.0.1023(15806.001)
X-imss-scores: Clean:100.00000 C:0 M:0 S:0 R:0
X-imss-settings: Baseline:1 C:1 M:1 S:1 R:1 (0.0000 0.0000)
Subject: [CGA-EXT] [Fwd: Next steps on CSI after IETF71]
X-BeenThere: cga-ext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: CGA and SeND Extensions <cga-ext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext>, <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/cga-ext>
List-Post: <mailto:cga-ext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext>, <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: cga-ext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: cga-ext-bounces@ietf.org
Hi, these are the next steps for the items discussed in the meeting. let us know if you have comments. Regards, Gabriel and marcelo Proxy SND Problem Statement draft-daley-send-spnd-prob-02 One more version of the draft addressing comments in the meeting and then we will ask for adoption The new version should address Dave Thaler comments about the different scenarios, anycast case to be studied in more depth, multicast is out of scope, may be kept just to mention what is not covered by the solutions space Certificate profiles and Management Initial work being done, if more people is interested, join the team DHCPv6 Delegation of Certificates Option draft-popoviciu-dhc-certificate-opt-01.txt C. Popoviciu, R. Droms, E. Levy-Abegnoli - 15 min WG to read the draft and comment Hash Threat Analysis for SeND and Send Crypto Agility A. Kukec, S. Jiang, S. Krishnan - 20 min Authors to produce a draft including a proposal n how to encode hash agility. If the proposal is adopted, this will be part of RFC3971 update 8. Update for RFC3971: support in SEND for non-CGA addresses E. Levy-Abegnoli Not clear how to deal with this, more disucssion is needed. What is clear is that something is needed in this space, since the the original rfc3971 is incomplete in this area 9. Public key algortihm agility in SeND S. Shuo We expect two things: a draft on how to support ECC in SeND and CGAs, and a proposal on how to support PK agility in SeND and CGAs to be uncluded in the rfc3971/2 update People interested in working on this should contact the chairs _______________________________________________ CGA-EXT mailing list CGA-EXT@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext
- [CGA-EXT] [Fwd: Next steps on CSI after IETF71] marcelo bagnulo
- Re: [CGA-EXT] [Fwd: Next steps on CSI after IETF7… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: [CGA-EXT] [Fwd: Next steps on CSI after IETF7… marcelo bagnulo
- Re: [CGA-EXT] [Fwd: Next steps on CSI after IETF7… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: [CGA-EXT] [Fwd: Next steps on CSI after IETF7… Greg Daley
- Re: [CGA-EXT] [Fwd: Next steps on CSI after IETF7… marcelo bagnulo
- Re: [CGA-EXT] [Fwd: Next steps on CSI after IETF7… Greg Daley