Re: [CGA-EXT] [Fwd: Next steps on CSI after IETF71]
Greg Daley <hoskuld@hotmail.com> Wed, 02 April 2008 01:14 UTC
Return-Path: <cga-ext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: cga-ext-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-cga-ext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 241A53A68BC; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 18:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: cga-ext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cga-ext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627693A68BC for <cga-ext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 18:14:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.167
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.167 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.165, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_73=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 83An+JBf021T for <cga-ext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 18:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bay0-omc2-s41.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc2-s41.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.177]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0533E3A6892 for <cga-ext@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 18:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BAY114-W55 ([65.54.169.155]) by bay0-omc2-s41.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 1 Apr 2008 18:14:22 -0700
Message-ID: <BAY114-W55C9771CDFBF99C547F0F2ADF40@phx.gbl>
X-Originating-IP: [203.8.7.222]
From: Greg Daley <hoskuld@hotmail.com>
To: marcelo bagnulo <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:14:22 +1000
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <47ECAD9D.8000303@it.uc3m.es>
References: <47E6D7AF.9010904@it.uc3m.es> <BAY114-W76EE310064B9E880F196CADF90@phx.gbl> <47ECAD9D.8000303@it.uc3m.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Apr 2008 01:14:22.0691 (UTC) FILETIME=[E2705B30:01C8945E]
Cc: cga-ext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [CGA-EXT] [Fwd: Next steps on CSI after IETF71]
X-BeenThere: cga-ext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: CGA and SeND Extensions <cga-ext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext>, <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/cga-ext>
List-Post: <mailto:cga-ext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext>, <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0000020105=="
Sender: cga-ext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: cga-ext-bounces@ietf.org
Hi Marcelo, Thanks for the elaboration. Greg > Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:34:37 +0100 > From: marcelo@it.uc3m.es > To: hoskuld@hotmail.com > CC: cga-ext@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [CGA-EXT] [Fwd: Next steps on CSI after IETF71] > > Hi Greg, > > Dave Thaler made the following comment in the meeting: > Anycast is important, multicast isn't, because anycast is like a > normal address so it's important for the problem statement, multicast > doesn't belong in there > Good to have high level recognition of the issues even if we don't > implement it, documenting is good > > So, it is up to the WG to decide what to do with this, but it seems > clear to me that we are not chartered to solve the multicast problem, so > no solution work will be done at this stage amd w.r.t. the problem > statement, we should mention something, but essnetially, we should state > that we are not addressing this problem and maybe explain why this is > different problem that cannot be addressed in principle with the same > tools, makes sense? > > regards, marcelo > > > Greg Daley escribió: > > Hi Marcelo, > > > > Just to clarify,for the problem statment: > > > > Can I take it that no multicast is to be covered in the problem > > statement, other than > > those issues referenced through RFC4389, that are also required to get > > unsecured ND proxying to work? > > > > Greg Daley > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:20:31 +0100 > > > From: marcelo@it.uc3m.es > > > To: cga-ext@ietf.org > > > Subject: [CGA-EXT] [Fwd: Next steps on CSI after IETF71] > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > these are the next steps for the items discussed in the meeting. > > > let us know if you have comments. > > > > > > Regards, Gabriel and marcelo > > > > > > Proxy SND Problem Statement > > > draft-daley-send-spnd-prob-02 > > > > > > One more version of the draft addressing comments in the meeting and > > > then we will ask for adoption > > > The new version should address Dave Thaler comments about the different > > > scenarios, anycast case to be studied in more depth, multicast is > > out of > > > scope, may be kept just to mention what is not covered by the solutions > > > space > > > > > > Certificate profiles and Management > > > Initial work being done, if more people is interested, join the team > > > > > > DHCPv6 Delegation of Certificates Option > > > draft-popoviciu-dhc-certificate-opt-01.txt > > > C. Popoviciu, R. Droms, E. Levy-Abegnoli - 15 min > > > > > > WG to read the draft and comment > > > > > > Hash Threat Analysis for SeND and Send Crypto Agility > > > A. Kukec, S. Jiang, S. Krishnan - 20 min > > > Authors to produce a draft including a proposal n how to encode hash > > > agility. If the proposal is adopted, this will be part of RFC3971 update > > > > > > > > > 8. Update for RFC3971: support in SEND for non-CGA addresses > > > E. Levy-Abegnoli > > > > > > Not clear how to deal with this, more disucssion is needed. > > > What is clear is that something is needed in this space, since the the > > > original rfc3971 is incomplete in this area > > > > > > 9. Public key algortihm agility in SeND > > > S. Shuo > > > We expect two things: a draft on how to support ECC in SeND and CGAs, > > > and a proposal on how to support PK agility in SeND and CGAs to be > > > uncluded in the rfc3971/2 update > > > People interested in working on this should contact the chairs > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > CGA-EXT mailing list > > > CGA-EXT@ietf.org > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Click here Get MOTORAZR MAXX V6 now $249 on Next G™ Pre-Paid > > <http://clk.atdmt.com/OAT/go/nnmsntel0690000034oat/direct/01/> > _________________________________________________________________ It's simple! Sell your car for just $30 at CarPoint.com.au http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fsecure%2Dau%2Eimrworldwide%2Ecom%2Fcgi%2Dbin%2Fa%2Fci%5F450304%2Fet%5F2%2Fcg%5F801459%2Fpi%5F1004813%2Fai%5F859641&_t=762955845&_r=tig_OCT07&_m=EXT
_______________________________________________ CGA-EXT mailing list CGA-EXT@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext
- [CGA-EXT] [Fwd: Next steps on CSI after IETF71] marcelo bagnulo
- Re: [CGA-EXT] [Fwd: Next steps on CSI after IETF7… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: [CGA-EXT] [Fwd: Next steps on CSI after IETF7… marcelo bagnulo
- Re: [CGA-EXT] [Fwd: Next steps on CSI after IETF7… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: [CGA-EXT] [Fwd: Next steps on CSI after IETF7… Greg Daley
- Re: [CGA-EXT] [Fwd: Next steps on CSI after IETF7… marcelo bagnulo
- Re: [CGA-EXT] [Fwd: Next steps on CSI after IETF7… Greg Daley