Re: [CGA-EXT] [Fwd: Next steps on CSI after IETF71]

Greg Daley <hoskuld@hotmail.com> Fri, 28 March 2008 02:37 UTC

Return-Path: <cga-ext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-cga-ext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-cga-ext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEB5D3A6856; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:37:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -97.776
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-97.776 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.540, BAYES_50=0.001, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_73=0.6, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mWuXF2izNVRM; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D4C3A6A24; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: cga-ext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cga-ext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3CA33A63D3 for <cga-ext@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:36:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XLaJFbA1cW2u for <cga-ext@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:36:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bay0-omc2-s35.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc2-s35.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.171]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D43D83A699D for <cga-ext@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:36:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BAY114-W7 ([65.54.169.107]) by bay0-omc2-s35.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:36:56 -0700
Message-ID: <BAY114-W76EE310064B9E880F196CADF90@phx.gbl>
X-Originating-IP: [203.8.7.222]
From: Greg Daley <hoskuld@hotmail.com>
To: marcelo bagnulo <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>, cga-ext@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:36:56 +1100
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <47E6D7AF.9010904@it.uc3m.es>
References: <47E6D7AF.9010904@it.uc3m.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Mar 2008 02:36:56.0675 (UTC) FILETIME=[972D9330:01C8907C]
Subject: Re: [CGA-EXT] [Fwd: Next steps on CSI after IETF71]
X-BeenThere: cga-ext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: CGA and SeND Extensions <cga-ext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext>, <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/cga-ext>
List-Post: <mailto:cga-ext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext>, <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0790586446=="
Sender: cga-ext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: cga-ext-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Marcelo,

Just to clarify,for the problem statment:

Can I take it that no multicast is to be covered in the problem statement, other than 
those issues referenced through RFC4389, that are also required to get 
unsecured ND proxying to work?

Greg Daley


> Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:20:31 +0100
> From: marcelo@it.uc3m.es
> To: cga-ext@ietf.org
> Subject: [CGA-EXT] [Fwd: Next steps on CSI after IETF71]
> 
> Hi,
> 
> these are the next steps for the items discussed in the meeting.
> let us know if you have comments.
> 
> Regards, Gabriel and marcelo
> 
> Proxy SND Problem Statement
> draft-daley-send-spnd-prob-02
> 
> One more version of the draft addressing comments in the meeting and 
> then we will ask for adoption
> The new version should address Dave Thaler comments about the different 
> scenarios, anycast case to be studied in more depth, multicast is out of 
> scope, may be kept just to mention what is not covered by the solutions 
> space
> 
> Certificate profiles and Management
> Initial work being done, if more people is interested, join the team
> 
> DHCPv6 Delegation of Certificates Option
> draft-popoviciu-dhc-certificate-opt-01.txt
> C. Popoviciu, R. Droms, E. Levy-Abegnoli - 15 min
> 
> WG to read the draft and comment
> 
> Hash Threat Analysis for SeND and Send Crypto Agility
> A. Kukec, S. Jiang, S. Krishnan - 20 min
> Authors to produce a draft including a proposal n how to encode hash 
> agility. If the proposal is adopted, this will be part of RFC3971 update
> 
> 
> 8. Update for RFC3971: support in SEND for non-CGA addresses
> E. Levy-Abegnoli
> 
> Not clear how to deal with this, more disucssion is needed.
> What is clear is that something is needed in this space, since the the 
> original rfc3971 is incomplete in this area
> 
> 9. Public key algortihm agility in SeND
> S. Shuo
> We expect two things: a draft on how to support ECC in SeND and CGAs, 
> and a proposal on how to support PK agility in SeND and CGAs to be 
> uncluded in the rfc3971/2 update
> People interested in working on this should contact the chairs
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CGA-EXT mailing list
> CGA-EXT@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext

_________________________________________________________________
Get MOTORAZR MAXX V6 now $249 on Next G™ Pre-Paid
http://clk.atdmt.com/OAT/go/nnmsntel0690000034oat/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
CGA-EXT mailing list
CGA-EXT@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext